Ben Green's Open Problem 37
Determine the asymptotic equivalence class (theta) of m(N, k).
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Determine the asymptotic equivalence class (theta) of m(N, k).
Determine an upper bound (big O) for m(N, k).
Determine a strict upper bound (little o) for m(N, k).
Can we improve the lower bound?
Can we improve the best upper bound?
If is random, , can we almost surely cover with translates of ? [Gr24]
"I do not know how to answer this even with 100 replaced by 1.01." [Gr24]"
Similar questions are interesting with replaced by for any . [Gr24]
NOTE: using translates as stated makes the conjecture trivially false by the pigeonhole principle. Indeed for a set of size , we cover at most elements, which is strictly less than for . We interpret the question as asking whether translates suffice. This generalizes the main conjecture where .
Does ? [Gr24]
The possibility that f(r) = 1 for all r has not been ruled out [Gr24]
It is not known whether f(2) = 1 [Gr24]
Does ? [Gr24]
Does ? [Gr24]
Which finite groups have the smallest biggest product-free sets?
We formalise this as: determine the supremum of exponents such that every nontrivial finite group of order contains a product-free set of size for some absolute constant . (The trivial group is excluded since its only product-free subset is empty.) Kedlaya [Ke97] showed that is admissible, and Green suggests this exponent may well be sharp; the candidate extremal family is the Ree groups , .
A good model problem would be to determine the largest product-free subsets of .
Let be a set of density . Does contain a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
More precisely: does there exist an absolute constant such that for all and all nonempty with density , the sumset contains a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
The sumset is defined as , using the pointwise
scalar multiplication notation 10 • A where • denotes the iterated addition of a set.
Note: We model as Fin n → ZMod 2, which is an -dimensional vector space
over .
Suppose that is a set of density . What is the largest size of coset guaranteed to be contained in ?
We phrase this by asking for the exact function giving the maximum dimension of a guaranteed coset.
Suppose that has density . Does contain a subspace of co-dimension ? [Sa11, Question 5.1]
Suppose that is a set with an additive complement of size . Does contain a coset of codimension ?
Could even contain a coset of codimension ?