Erdős Problem 812: I
Is it true that for some constant , for all large ?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Is it true that for some constant , for all large ?
Is it true that ?
Let . Define to be the minimal such that contains some of size such that
contains no non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Estimate . In particular, is it true that
Does there exist a such that the -sized subsets of {1,...,2k} can be coloured with colours such that for every with all colours appear among the -sized subsets of ?
Alternative statement of Erdős Problem 835 using the chromatic number of the Johnson graph. This is equivalent to asking whether there exists such that the chromatic number of the Johnson graph is .
Is the chromatic number of J(2 * k, k) always at least k + 2?
Is it true that, for all large , ?
Estimate m(n,k), or better give an asymptotic formula.
There exists a constant such that, for all large , if has size at least then there are distinct such that .
A problem of Erdős and Sós (also earlier considered by Choi, Erdős, and Szemerédi [CES75], but Erdős had forgotten this).
Erdős and Sós conjectured that , where is the minimal size of a subset of guaranteeing elements have all pairwise sums in the set.
Erdős Problem 872, part (i) (weak form): there exists a constant such that the game length is at least for all sufficiently large .
Erdős Problem 872, part (ii) (strong form): for every , the game length is at least for all sufficiently large .
Status note: the forum thread (April-May 2026) records Shortener strategies giving (described in the thread as accepted as correct, with a Lean formalization in progress) and a claimed , either of which would answer this question negatively under the Prolonger-first convention. Neither is published, so the statement is recorded here as the original Erdős question.
Forum-related variant: how small can a maximal primitive subset of be? The set of primes in is a maximal primitive subset of size , and the forum thread asks whether this is the smallest possible for all . Equivalently: must every completed play of the saturation game, by both players and regardless of strategy, claim at least elements? (Terminal positions of the game are exactly the maximal primitive subsets.)
Let A ⊂ ℕ be an additive basis of order k which is minimal in the sense that
if B ⊂ A is any infinite set, then A \ B is not a basis of order k.
Must there exist an infinite B ⊂ A such that A \ B
is an additive basis of order k + 1?
Does the limit tend to infinity?
(Other finite limits have been ruled out by [KoLu25], see below)
Is the upper density of the set of odd numbers that cannot be expressed as a prime plus two powers of 2 positive?
Is there a graph with vertices and chromatic number such that every subgraph on vertices has chromatic number ?
Is there a graph with vertices and chromatic number such that every subgraph on vertices has chromatic number ?
Is there a graph with vertices and chromatic number such that every subgraph on vertices has chromatic number ?