Erdős Problem 456: Ii
Does for almost all ?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Does for almost all ?
Are there infinitely many primes such that is the only for which ?
More generally, let denote the least prime which does not divide . This problem asks whether infinitely often.
Taking to be the product of primes between and gives an example where
Can one prove that for all large and some ?
Let denote the least common multiple of . Let be the -th prime. Is it true that for all , ?
Is there a function with as such that, for all large , there is a composite number such that
Here is the least prime factor of .
Let be the set of all such that with distinct proper divisors of , but this is not true for any with . Does:
converge?
Are there any odd weird numbers?
Are there infinitely many primitive weird numbers?
Is it true that, for all , there are infinitely many such that ?
For each choose some . Let . Must have a logarithmic density?
Let be a set such that . Let . If then is it true that exists (and is finite)?
For example, when then is the set of squarefree numbers, and the existence of this limit was proved by Erdős.
See also [208].
Let . Is it true that? This is also known as the Littlewood conjecture.
Let be the asymptotic distribution function of , so that for each , is the natural density of . Is it true that there is no such that the derivative exists and is positive?
Is there an infinite set such that for every , there is an integer n such that , and yet if is the smallest such integer, then as ?
Chowla's cosine problem*
If is a finite set of positive integers of size then is there some absolute constant and such that
Let be a finite set of integers. Is it true that for every
Let be a Rademacher multiplicative function. Does there exist some constant such that, almost surely,
Let and be sufficiently large. Is it true that if has size at least then there must be distinct such that where denotes the least common multiple?
Let count the number of divisors of . Is there some such that