Erdős Problem 307
Are there two finite set of primes and such that
?
Asked by Barbeau [Ba76].
[Ba76] Barbeau, E. J., Computer challenge corner: Problem 477: A brute force program.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Are there two finite set of primes and such that
?
Asked by Barbeau [Ba76].
[Ba76] Barbeau, E. J., Computer challenge corner: Problem 477: A brute force program.
Are there infinitely many pairs (m, P) where m ≥ 2 is an integer
and P is a set of distinct primes such that the following equation holds:
?
It is conjectured that the set of primary pseudoperfect numbers is infinite.
Is there some constant such that for every there exists some for with
Is it true that for sufficiently large , for any , whenever the left-hand side is not zero?
Does there exist a set such that and every sufficiently large integer can be written as for some prime and ?
Can the bound be achieved for an additive complement to the primes? [Guy04] writes that Erdős offered $50 for the solution.
Let be the size of the largest such that all sums are distinct for . What is ?
Let be the size of the largest such that all sums are distinct for . What is ?
Let be the size of the largest such that all sums are distinct for . Find the simplest such that .
Let be the size of the largest such that all sums are distinct for . Find the simplest such that .
Is it true that for all ?
This would have significant applications to Waring's problem. Erdős and Graham describe this as 'unattackable by the methods at our disposal'.
Is it true that if then for sufficiently large ?
For it is not known if .
Does there exist a polynomial such that all the sums with nonnegative integers are distinct?
Probably has the property that the sums with nonnegative integers are distinct.
Writing for the number of integers which are the sum of three th powers, is it true that ?
Writing for the number of integers which are the sum of three th powers, is it even true that ?
Let A ⊆ ℕ be a set such that every integer can be written as n^2 + a
for some a in A and n ≥ 0. What is the smallest possible value of
lim sup n → ∞ |A ∩ {1, …, N}| / N^(1/2)?
Ruzsa suggests that a non-trivial variant of this problem arises if one imposes the stronger condition that for some constant , and similarly for .