Green's Open Problem 27: Upper
Propose a better upper bound along primes.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Propose a better upper bound along primes.
Let and be some large integer. What is the size of the largest set such that is not a sum of a subset of ? Does this depend on in an irregular way?
Can we improve the lower bound , at least for infinitely many ?
Let and be some large integer. What is the size of the largest set such that is not a sum of a subset of ? Does this depend on in an irregular way?
Can we improve the lower bound , for all sufficiently large ?
There is no consecutive triple of powerful numbers.
Can we improve the upper bound [CHO25], at least for infinitely many ?
Erdős [Er76d] conjectured a stronger statement: if is the th powerful number, then for some constant .
[Er76d] Erdős, P., Problems and results on number theoretic properties of consecutive integers and related questions. Proceedings of the Fifth Manitoba Conference on Numerical Mathematics (Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man., 1975) (1976), 25-44.
Can we improve the upper bound [CHO25], for all sufficiently large ?
Are there any -full such that is -full?
It is not known whether or not there exists a Sidon subset of of size , for all [Gr24].
Are there infinitely many 3-full such that is 2-full?
It is not known whether, if is an abelian group of size , there always exists a Sidon subset of of size [Gr24].
Are there any consecutive pairs of -full integers?
Another very nice old problem is whether there is a Sidon subset of of size , where [Gr24].
Let denote the largest prime factor of . Show that the set of with has density .
Let be a prime and let be a set of size . Is there a dilate of containing a gap of length ?
Show that the equation n!=a_1!a_2!···a_k!, with n−1 > a_1 ≥ a_2 ≥ ··· ≥ a_k, has
only finitely many solutions.
Even what happens in the regime is unclear [Gr24].
Hickerson conjectured the largest solution the equation n!=a_1!a_2!···a_k!, with
n−1 > a_1 ≥ a_2 ≥ ··· ≥ a_k, is 16!=14!5!2!.