Erdős Problem 1167
Finite-target case.* When all are finite,
is the ordinary natural-number successor. Special case of erdos_1167.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Finite-target case.* When all are finite,
is the ordinary natural-number successor. Special case of erdos_1167.
Binary-color case.* The specialization (two color classes).
Infinite-target case.* When all are infinite and bounded by , , so the hypothesis simplifies to a "pure" stepping-down lemma:
\lambda \to (\kappa_\alpha)_{\alpha<\gamma}^r.$$ The condition $\kappa_\alpha \leq \lambda$ is needed to avoid a size obstruction: without it, the conclusion would require a subset of $\lambda$ of size $\kappa_\alpha > \lambda$, which is impossible (see `infinite_targets_needs_bound`).case.* The stepping-down from 3-uniform to 2-uniform partition relations: implies . Generalises the classical Erdős–Rado stepping-up/down theorem for pairs.
Let be an uncountable cardinal. Must there exist a cardinal such that every graph with chromatic number contains a triangle-free subgraph with chromatic number ?
Shelah proved that a negative answer is consistent when
(see erdos_1175.variants.shelah_consistency).
Threshold reformulation variant.* Replaces chromaticCardinal = λ in the hypothesis
of erdos_1175 with λ ≤ chromaticCardinal (a graph of chromatic number ≥ λ has a
triangle-free subgraph of chromatic number κ). This is a strengthening of erdos_1175
(see erdos_1175.test.threshold_implies_exact).
Does there exist, for all , a basis of order (so that for all large ) such that for all ?
Is it true that in any 2-colouring of there exists an infinite set such that all elements of are the same colour?
A conjecture of Owings [Ow74].
Let be an infinite set. Must there be a set of positive measure which does not contain any set of the shape for some and ?
Let G be a graph with n vertices such that every induced subgraph on ≥ vertices has more than edges. Must G contain a triangle?
A general version asks, for a fixed , if a set has no and such that and , then is it true that ?
Let . Are there consecutive primes in arithmetic progression?
Are there consecutive primes in arithmetic progression?
It is open, even for , whether there are infinitely many such progressions.
Fix a . Is it true that there are infinitely many arithmetic prime progressions of length ?
Let be a finite Sidon set and . Is it true that as ?
Is it true that for every we have
for all sufficiently large ?
Does there exist a maximal Sidon set of size ?
A question of Erdős, Sárközy, and Sós [ESS94].
Let A be an infinite B₂[2] set. Must liminf |A ∩ {1, ..., N}| * N ^ (- 1 / 2) = 0?
Estimate by finding a better upper bound.