Erdős Problem 1054: Ii
Let be the minimal integer such that is the sum of the smallest divisors of for some . Is it true that for almost all ?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Let be the minimal integer such that is the sum of the smallest divisors of for some . Is it true that for almost all ?
Let be the minimal integer such that is the sum of the smallest divisors of for some . Is it true that ?
A prime is in class if the only prime divisors of are or . In general, a prime is in class if every prime factor of is in some class , with equality for at least one prime factor. Are there infinitely many primes in each class?
A prime is in class if the only prime divisors of are or . In general, a prime is in class if every prime factor of is in some class , with equality for at least one prime factor. If is the least prime in class , then how does behave? Erdos conjectured that this tends to infinity.
A prime is in class if the only prime divisors of are or . In general, a prime is in class if every prime factor of is in some class , with equality for at least one prime factor. If is the least prime in class , then how does behave? Selfridge conjectured that this is bounded.
Let . Does there exist a prime and consecutive intervals such that for all ?
Noll and Simmons asked, more generally, whether there are solutions to for arbitrarily large (with ).
Is it true that ?
This is discussed in problem A13 of Guy's collection [Gu04].
Pomerance [Po89] gave a heuristic suggesting that this is the true order of growth, and in fact .
Are there infinitely many primes such that is composite for each such that ?
The conjecture is about the function which counts the number of solutions to , where is the sum of divisors of . The first bound is that grows slower than any power of . The second bound is that is at most a power of .
Part (ii) of Erdős Problem 1060: bound on the number of with .
How many (ordered) solutions are there to σ(a) + σ(b) = σ(a + b) with a + b ≤ x?
Is it true that this number is asymptotic to c * x for some constant c > 0?
Erdős asked whether the limiting density f n / n exists and, if so, whether it is
irrational.
Estimate by finding a better upper bound.
Are there infinitely many primes such that for some prime and ?
This is mentioned as B46 in Unsolved Problems in Number Theory by Richard K. Guy
Are there infinitely many primes such that for some prime and , ?
Is it true that there are infinitely many for which ?
Is it true that for in a density 1 subset of the primes?
Erdős, Hardy, and Subbarao [HaSu02], believed that the number of for which is .
[HaSu02] Hardy, G. E. and Subbarao, M. V., A modified problem of Pillai and some related questions. Amer. Math. Monthly (2002), 554--559.