Ben Green's Open Problem 40: Arbitrary Subsets
Does ? [Gr24]
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Does ? [Gr24]
Does ? [Gr24]
Which finite groups have the smallest biggest product-free sets?
We formalise this as: determine the supremum of exponents such that every nontrivial finite group of order contains a product-free set of size for some absolute constant . (The trivial group is excluded since its only product-free subset is empty.) Kedlaya [Ke97] showed that is admissible, and Green suggests this exponent may well be sharp; the candidate extremal family is the Ree groups , .
A good model problem would be to determine the largest product-free subsets of .
Let be a set of density . Does contain a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
More precisely: does there exist an absolute constant such that for all and all nonempty with density , the sumset contains a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
The sumset is defined as , using the pointwise
scalar multiplication notation 10 • A where • denotes the iterated addition of a set.
Note: We model as Fin n → ZMod 2, which is an -dimensional vector space
over .
Suppose that is a set of density . What is the largest size of coset guaranteed to be contained in ?
We phrase this by asking for the exact function giving the maximum dimension of a guaranteed coset.
Suppose that has density . Does contain a subspace of co-dimension ? [Sa11, Question 5.1]
Suppose that is a set with an additive complement of size . Does contain a coset of codimension ?
Could even contain a coset of codimension ?
Suppose both have size at least . Must the sumset contain a composite number?
The no-k-in-line problem: For and , the AllowedSetSize is , i. e. on an subset, there is a set of points for which no lie on a line (and not such a set of bigger size).
Green's Open Problem 72 / No-three-in-line problem*: The no-k-in-line conjecture holds for .
Does the no-three-in-line problem hold when is big enough?
Given points in the unit disc, must there be a triangle of area at most determined by them?
Problem 9 (ii): is ?
Problem 9 (iii): is , where ?
Let be a set of integers. Is there a set of size such that the restricted sumset is disjoint from ?
Suppose that is open and has measure greater than . Is there a solution to with ?
Sieve by removing half the residue classes mod , for primes . Does the remaining set have size at most ?
We interpret "half the residue classes" as .
We conjecture that the best-known lower bound can be improved.