Kaplansky's Conjectures
The zero-divisor conjecture*
If G is torsion-free, then the group algebra K[G] has no non-trivial zero divisors.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.The zero-divisor conjecture*
If G is torsion-free, then the group algebra K[G] has no non-trivial zero divisors.
If is a group, can there exist an exact covering of by more than one coset of different sizes? (i.e. each element is contained in exactly one of the cosets.)
The conjectured answer is no: in every such exact covering, two of the subgroups have the same cardinality.
The idempotent conjecture*
If G is torsion-free, then K[G] has no non-trivial idempotents.
Let be a group, and let be a finite system of left cosets of subgroups of .
Herzog and Schönheim conjectured that if forms a partition of with , then the indices cannot be distinct.
Suppose that is a -approximate group (not necessarily abelian). Is there , , with ?
What is the largest product-free set in the alternating group ?
Let and be finite groups of the same order with , where is the Euler totient function. Suppose that is simple. Is necessarily simple?
Let be a finite -group and assume that all abelian normal subgroups of have order at most . Is it true that every abelian subgroup of has order at most ?
Markel's -conjecture* (1973): any nontrivial finite ah-group is isomorphic to .
The conjecture is open in general; it is known to be true for solvable groups.
Let be a finitely generated group, and assume there exists such that for every in , . Is necessarily finite?
If a finitely generated group has superpolynomial growth, then with respect to any finite generating set its growth function is at least in Grigorchuk's preorder on growth functions, where the comparison is witnessed by linearly rescaling the radius.
Conjecture:* Are there infinitely many Leinster groups?
This asks whether there exist infinitely many (non-isomorphic) finite groups that are Leinster groups.
Formalized via the negation of "Does there exist an n such that all Leinster groups have order less than n".
Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture* (1973): every group is surjunctive.
That is, for every group G and every finite alphabet A, every injective cellular
automaton on A^G is surjective.
Suppose that is a finite group, and let be a subset of density . Is it true that there are triples such that all lie in ?
Note: A is taken as -dense, i.e. [Au16, Question 2]
Do the following exist, for arbitrarily large ? An abelian group with , together with subsets satisfying and , such that the sets are disjoint from the sets ()?
NOTE: according to [CKS05, 4.1], the conditions should be disjoint from for
. See green_36.variants.cks05.
Variant using the exact simultaneous double product property from [CKS05, 4.1].
Which finite groups have the smallest biggest product-free sets?
We formalise this as: determine the supremum of exponents such that every nontrivial finite group of order contains a product-free set of size for some absolute constant . (The trivial group is excluded since its only product-free subset is empty.) Kedlaya [Ke97] showed that is admissible, and Green suggests this exponent may well be sharp; the candidate extremal family is the Ree groups , .
A good model problem would be to determine the largest product-free subsets of .
Babai–Seress Conjecture (Conjecture 1.5)**: There exists an absolute constant such that the diameter of the alternating group satisfies Reference: L. Babai and Á. Seress, On the diameter of permutation groups, European Journal of Combinatorics 13 (1992), Conjecture 1.5
Babai–Seress Conjecture (Conjecture 1.7)**: There exists an absolute constant such that every finite simple non-abelian group satisfies Reference: L. Babai and Á. Seress, On the diameter of permutation groups, European Journal of Combinatorics 13 (1992), Conjecture 1.7