CA split rowwise implies CA
CA_split_rowwise_implies_CA
Plain-language statement
NOTE: This could be generalized to 2 * N instead of 2 ^ (ϑ + 1). Also, this can be proved for ↔ instead of →.
Exact Lean statement
theorem CA_split_rowwise_implies_CA
{ϑ : ℕ} (u : WordStack A (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1))) ι) (e : ℕ) :
let U₀ : WordStack A (Fin (2^ϑ)) ιFormal artifact
Lean source
theorem CA_split_rowwise_implies_CA {ϑ : ℕ} (u : WordStack A (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1))) ι) (e : ℕ) : let U₀ : WordStack A (Fin (2^ϑ)) ι := (splitHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords (ϑ := ϑ) u).1 let U₁ : WordStack A (Fin (2^ϑ)) ι := (splitHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords (ϑ := ϑ) u).2 jointProximityNat₂ (u₀ := ⋈|U₀) (u₁ := ⋈|U₁) (e := e) (C := C ^⋈ (Fin (2 ^ ϑ))) → jointProximityNat (u := u) (e := e) (C := C) := by -- 1. Unfold definitions unfold jointProximityNat₂ jointProximityNat simp only set U₀ := (splitHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords (ϑ := ϑ) u).1 set U₁ := (splitHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords (ϑ := ϑ) u).2 conv_lhs => rw [Code.closeToCode_iff_closeToCodeword_of_minDist] intro hCA_split_rowwise rcases hCA_split_rowwise with ⟨vSplit, hvSplit_mem, hvSplit_dist_le_e⟩ -- ⊢ Δ₀(⋈|u, ↑(C ^⋈ (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1))))) ≤ ↑e rw [closeToWord_iff_exists_possibleDisagreeCols] at hvSplit_dist_le_e rcases hvSplit_dist_le_e with ⟨D, hD_card_le_e, h_agree_outside_D⟩ conv_lhs => rw [←interleavedCode_eq_interleavedCodeSet (C := C)] rw [Code.closeToCode_iff_closeToCodeword_of_minDist (u := ⋈|u) (e := e) (C := C ^⋈ (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1))))] simp_rw [closeToWord_iff_exists_possibleDisagreeCols] let VSplit_rowwise := Matrix.transpose vSplit let VSplit₀_rowwise := Matrix.transpose (VSplit_rowwise 0) let VSplit₁_rowwise := Matrix.transpose (VSplit_rowwise 1) let v_rowwise_finmap : WordStack A (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1))) ι := mergeHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords VSplit₀_rowwise VSplit₁_rowwise let v_IC := ⋈| v_rowwise_finmap use v_IC constructor · -- v_IC ∈ ↑(C ^⋈ (Fin (2 ^ (ϑ + 1)))) -- rw [interleavedCode_eq_interleavedCodeSet] -- simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_interleavedCode_iff] intro rowIdx have h_vSplit_rows_mem : ∀ (i : Fin 2) (j : Fin (2 ^ ϑ)), (fun col ↦ vSplit col i j) ∈ C := by intro i specialize hvSplit_mem i exact hvSplit_mem dsimp only [v_IC] change v_rowwise_finmap rowIdx ∈ C unfold v_rowwise_finmap mergeHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords by_cases hk : rowIdx.val < 2 ^ ϑ · simp only [hk, ↓reduceDIte] exact h_vSplit_rows_mem 0 ⟨rowIdx.val, hk⟩ · simp only [hk, ↓reduceDIte] exact h_vSplit_rows_mem 1 ⟨rowIdx.val - 2 ^ ϑ, by omega⟩ -- END OF MODIFIED SECTION · use D constructor · exact hD_card_le_e · intro colIdx h_colIdx_notin_D funext rowIdx dsimp only [v_IC] change u rowIdx colIdx = v_rowwise_finmap rowIdx colIdx have hRes := h_agree_outside_D colIdx (h_colIdx_notin_D) simp_rw [funext_iff] at hRes unfold v_rowwise_finmap mergeHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords by_cases hk : rowIdx.val < 2 ^ ϑ · simp only [hk, ↓reduceDIte] exact hRes 0 ⟨rowIdx, by omega⟩ · simp only [hk, ↓reduceDIte] change u rowIdx colIdx = vSplit colIdx 1 ⟨↑rowIdx - 2 ^ ϑ, by omega⟩ have hRes₁ := hRes 1 ⟨rowIdx - 2 ^ ϑ, by omega⟩ dsimp only [splitHalfRowWiseInterleavedWords, Fin.isValue, U₁] at hRes₁ rw [←hRes₁] simp only [Interleavable.interleave, interleaveWordStack, finMapTwoWords, Matrix.transpose_apply] rw! [Nat.sub_add_cancel (h := by omega)] rfl- Project
- ArkLib
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- fad5cbf80877
- Source
- ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/ProximityGap/DG25/Basic.lean:203-270
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes
affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes
Project documentation
This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose coeff
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff
Plain-language statement
The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose lawful
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful
Plain-language statement
The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.