All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · mathlib@fabf563a7c95

Binding game ext eq binding game

KZG.CommitmentScheme.binding_game_ext_eq_binding_game

Plain-language statement

Transition 1: extending the binding game output preserves the event.

Exact Lean statement

lemma binding_game_ext_eq_binding_game {n : ℕ} {AuxState : Type} [SampleableType G₁]
    (adversary : KzgBindingAdversary p G₁ G₂ n unifSpec AuxState) :
    Pr[Commitment.bindingCondition (Data := Fin (n + 1) → ZMod p) |
      Commitment.bindingGame (init := pure ∅) (impl := randomOracle) (AuxState := AuxState)
        (scheme := kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing))
        (adversary := adversary)]
    = Pr[bindingCondExt (p := p) (n := n) | bindingGameExt (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂)
      AuxState adversary (kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing))]

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
lemma binding_game_ext_eq_binding_game {n : } {AuxState : Type} [SampleableType G₁]    (adversary : KzgBindingAdversary p G₁ G₂ n unifSpec AuxState) :    Pr[Commitment.bindingCondition (Data := Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p) |      Commitment.bindingGame (init := pure ∅) (impl := randomOracle) (AuxState := AuxState)        (scheme := kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing))        (adversary := adversary)]    = Pr[bindingCondExt (p := p) (n := n) | bindingGameExt (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂)      AuxState adversary (kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing))] := by  let proj : BindingExtOutput (p := p) n G₁ G₂  BindingOutput (p := p) n :=    fun _, _, _, query, resp₁, resp₂, accept₁, accept₂, _, _ =>      query, resp₁, resp₂, accept₁, accept₂  have hcond_eq :      (bindingCondExt (p := p) (n := n) : _  Prop) =        (Commitment.bindingCondition (Data := Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) ∘ proj := by    funext x    rcases x with _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _, _    rfl  rw [hcond_eq]  apply OptionT.probEvent_eq_of_run_map_eq _ _ proj    (Commitment.bindingCondition (Data := Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p))  simp only [Commitment.bindingGame, bindingGameExt, kzg, OptionT.run, OptionT.mk]  rw [pure_bind]  have hsample :      (simulateQ randomOracle (Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p))).run' ∅ =        Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p) :=    Groups.simulateQ_randomOracle_sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p)  have hkeygen :      (simulateQ randomOracle (do        let a  Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p)        pure (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a,          Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a))).run' ∅        =      (fun a => (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a,        Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a))          <$> Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p) := by    calc      (simulateQ randomOracle (do        let a  Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p)        pure (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a,          Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a))).run' ∅          = (fun a => (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a,              Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a))              <$> (simulateQ randomOracle (Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p))).run' ∅ := by            rw [ StateT.run'_map_comm,  simulateQ_map]            rfl      _ = (fun a => (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a,              Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n a))              <$> Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p) := by            rw [hsample]  let pSpec' : ProtocolSpec 1 := !v[.P_to_V], !v[G₁]  let impl : QueryImpl _ (StateT unifSpec.QueryCache ProbComp) :=    QueryImpl.addLift      (randomOracle : QueryImpl unifSpec (StateT unifSpec.QueryCache ProbComp))      (challengeQueryImpl (pSpec := pSpec'))  let sample : ProbComp (ZMod p) := Groups.sampleNonzeroZMod (p := p)  let bodyBase : ZMod p  OracleComp _ (Option (BindingOutput (p := p) n)) := fun τ => do    let srs := Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ    let cm, query, resp₁, resp₂, st₁, st₂  liftComp (adversary.claim srs) _    let reduction := Reduction.mk (adversary.prover srs)      ((kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)).opening        (srs, srs)).verifier    let accept₁ := ( (reduction.verdict      (cm, (query, resp₁ :        (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) ×          OracleInterface.Response q)) st₁).run).getD false    let accept₂ := ( (reduction.verdict      (cm, (query, resp₂ :        (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) ×          OracleInterface.Response q)) st₂).run).getD false    pure (some (query, resp₁, resp₂, accept₁, accept₂ : BindingOutput (p := p) n))  let bodyExt : ZMod p  OracleComp _ (Option (BindingExtOutput (p := p) n G₁ G₂)) :=    fun τ => do      let srs := Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ      let cm, query, resp₁, resp₂, st₁, st₂  liftComp (adversary.claim srs) _      let reduction := Reduction.mk (adversary.prover srs)        ((kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)).opening          (srs, srs)).verifier      let result₁  (reduction.run        (cm, (query, resp₁ :          (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) × OracleInterface.Response q))        st₁).run      let result₂  (reduction.run        (cm, (query, resp₂ :          (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) × OracleInterface.Response q))        st₂).run      let accept₁ := result₁.map (fun result => result.2) |>.getD false      let accept₂ := result₂.map (fun result => result.2) |>.getD false      let proof₁ : G₁ := result₁.map (fun result => result.1.1 0) |>.getD (1 : G₁)      let proof₂ : G₁ := result₂.map (fun result => result.1.1 0) |>.getD (1 : G₁)      pure (some (τ, srs, cm, query, resp₁, resp₂, accept₁, accept₂, proof₁, proof₂))  rw [hkeygen]  simp only [map_eq_bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind, Function.comp]  change (OptionT.mk (do    let τ  sample    (simulateQ impl (bodyBase τ)).run' (∅ : unifSpec.QueryCache))).run =      (OptionT.mk (do        let τ  sample        let r  (simulateQ impl (bodyExt τ)).run' (∅ : unifSpec.QueryCache)        pure (Option.map (proj) r))).run  simpa only [id_map] using    congrArg OptionT.run      (OptionT.map_mk_bind_eq_of_body        (sample := sample)        (body₁ := fun τ => (simulateQ impl (bodyBase τ)).run' (∅ : unifSpec.QueryCache))        (body₂ := fun τ => (simulateQ impl (bodyExt τ)).run' (∅ : unifSpec.QueryCache))        (f := id) (post := fun _ => proj)        (hBody := by          intro τ          rw [ StateT.run'_map_comm (Option.map id),             StateT.run'_map_comm (Option.map proj)]          apply congrArg (fun mx : StateT unifSpec.QueryCache ProbComp            (Option (BindingOutput (p := p) n)) => mx.run' ∅)          dsimp only [bodyBase, bodyExt]          rw [ simulateQ_map,  simulateQ_map]          apply congrArg (simulateQ impl)          simp only [map_eq_bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]          congr 1          funext claim          rcases claim with cm, query, resp₁, resp₂, st₁, st₂          rw [Reduction.verdict_run_eq_map_run, Reduction.verdict_run_eq_map_run]          exact bind_two_option_project_get_d            (mx := ((Reduction.mk              (adversary.prover (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ))              ((kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)).opening                (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ,                  Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ)).verifier).run              (cm, (query, resp₁ :                (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) ×                  OracleInterface.Response q)) st₁).run)            (my := ((Reduction.mk              (adversary.prover (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ))              ((kzg (n := n) (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)).opening                (Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ,                  Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ)).verifier).run              (cm, (query, resp₂ :                (q : OracleInterface.Query (Fin (n + 1)  ZMod p)) ×                  OracleInterface.Response q)) st₂).run)            (fa := fun result : (FullTranscript pSpec' × Bool × Unit) × Bool => result.2)            (fb := fun result : (FullTranscript pSpec' × Bool × Unit) × Bool => result.2)            (da := false) (db := false)            (mkBase := fun accept₁ accept₂ =>              (query, resp₁, resp₂, accept₁, accept₂ : BindingOutput (p := p) n))            (mkExt := fun result₁ result₂ =>              (τ, Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ, cm, query,                resp₁, resp₂,                (Option.map (fun result => result.2) result₁).getD false,                (Option.map (fun result => result.2) result₂).getD false,                (Option.map (fun result => result.1.1 0) result₁).getD (1 : G₁),                (Option.map (fun result => result.1.1 0) result₂).getD (1 : G₁)))            (proj := proj) (by intro result₁ result₂; rfl)))
Project
ArkLib
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
fad5cbf80877
Source
ArkLib/Commitments/Functional/KZG/Binding.lean:312-461

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes

affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes

Project documentation

This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Gadget Decompose coeff

ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff

Plain-language statement

The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Gadget Decompose lawful

ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful

Plain-language statement

The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record