T sdh cond of two valid openings
KZG.CommitmentScheme.t_sdh_cond_of_two_valid_openings
Project documentation
The algebraic core of evaluation binding: two valid KZG openings of the same commitment at the same point, but to different values, yield a t-SDH solution with challenge c = -query. This lemma is intentionally isolated from the probabilistic (game-based) binding game. The proof of binding_cond_le_t_sdh_cond only needs to extract hsrs and the two `ve...
Exact Lean statement
lemma t_sdh_cond_of_two_valid_openings
(τ query resp₁ resp₂ : ZMod p) (cm proof₁ proof₂ : G₁)
(srs : Vector G₁ (n + 1) × Vector G₂ 2)
(hsrs : srs = Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ)
(hresp : resp₁ ≠ resp₂) (hg₁ : g₁ ≠ 1) (hpair : pairing g₁ g₂ ≠ 0)
(hverify₁ : KZG.verifyOpening (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)
srs.2 cm proof₁ query resp₁)
(hverify₂ : KZG.verifyOpening (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing)
srs.2 cm proof₂ query resp₂) :
Groups.tSdhCondition (p := p) (g₁ := g₁)
(τ, -query, (proof₁ / proof₂) ^ (1 / (resp₂ - resp₁)).val)Formal artifact
Lean source
lemma t_sdh_cond_of_two_valid_openings (τ query resp₁ resp₂ : ZMod p) (cm proof₁ proof₂ : G₁) (srs : Vector G₁ (n + 1) × Vector G₂ 2) (hsrs : srs = Groups.PowerSrs.generate (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) n τ) (hresp : resp₁ ≠ resp₂) (hg₁ : g₁ ≠ 1) (hpair : pairing g₁ g₂ ≠ 0) (hverify₁ : KZG.verifyOpening (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing) srs.2 cm proof₁ query resp₁) (hverify₂ : KZG.verifyOpening (g₁ := g₁) (g₂ := g₂) (pairing := pairing) srs.2 cm proof₂ query resp₂) : Groups.tSdhCondition (p := p) (g₁ := g₁) (τ, -query, (proof₁ / proof₂) ^ (1 / (resp₂ - resp₁)).val) := by have hpG1 : Nat.card G₁ = p := PrimeOrderWith.hCard have hord : orderOf g₁ = p := binding_order_of_eq_prime_of_ne_one g₁ hg₁ obtain ⟨cm', hcm⟩ := binding_exists_zmod_power_of_generator hpG1 hg₁ hord cm obtain ⟨prf₁, hprf₁⟩ := binding_exists_zmod_power_of_generator hpG1 hg₁ hord proof₁ obtain ⟨prf₂, hprf₂⟩ := binding_exists_zmod_power_of_generator hpG1 hg₁ hord proof₂ have hEq₁ : cm' - resp₁ = prf₁ * (τ - query) := verify_opening_equation pairing query resp₁ τ cm' prf₁ cm proof₁ srs hsrs hpair hcm hprf₁ hverify₁ have hEq₂ : cm' - resp₂ = prf₂ * (τ - query) := verify_opening_equation pairing query resp₂ τ cm' prf₂ cm proof₂ srs hsrs hpair hcm hprf₂ hverify₂ have hdenom : τ + -query ≠ 0 := t_sdh_denominator_ne_zero_of_opening_equations τ query resp₁ resp₂ cm' prf₁ prf₂ hresp hEq₁ hEq₂ refine ⟨hdenom, ?_⟩ have hfield_conflict : prf₁ * (τ - query) + resp₁ = prf₂ * (τ - query) + resp₂ := by linear_combination hEq₂ - hEq₁ have hfield_solution : (prf₁ - prf₂) / (resp₂ - resp₁) = 1 / (τ - query) := by have hresp_ne : resp₂ - resp₁ ≠ 0 := sub_ne_zero.mpr (Ne.symm hresp) have hτq_ne : τ - query ≠ 0 := by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using hdenom rw [div_eq_div_iff hresp_ne hτq_ne] linear_combination hfield_conflict rw [hprf₁, hprf₂, Groups.gpow_div_eq hord, ← pow_mul, pow_eq_pow_iff_modEq, hord] change (prf₁ - prf₂).val * (1 / (resp₂ - resp₁)).val % p = (1 / (τ + -query)).val % p rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (ZMod.val_lt _)] have hcast : (((prf₁ - prf₂).val * (1 / (resp₂ - resp₁)).val : ℕ) : ZMod p) = (1 / (τ + -query) : ZMod p) := by push_cast [ZMod.natCast_zmod_val] rw [mul_one_div, hfield_solution] ring have := congr_arg ZMod.val hcast rwa [ZMod.val_natCast] at this- Project
- ArkLib
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- fad5cbf80877
- Source
- ArkLib/Commitments/Functional/KZG/Binding.lean:181-226
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes
affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes
Project documentation
This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose coeff
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff
Plain-language statement
The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose lawful
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful
Plain-language statement
The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.