Plain-language statement
Main existence: if B/A agrees with low-degree quotients on enough lines, then A ∣ B.
Exact Lean statement
lemma ps_exists_p {F : Type} [Field F]
(a_x a_y b_x b_y : ℕ) (n_x n_y : ℕ+)
(h_bx_ge_ax : b_x ≥ a_x) (h_by_ge_ay : b_y ≥ a_y)
(A B : F[X][Y])
(h_f_degX : a_x ≥ degreeX A) (h_g_degX : b_x ≥ degreeX B)
(h_f_degY : a_y ≥ natDegreeY A) (h_g_degY : b_y ≥ natDegreeY B)
(P_x P_y : Finset F) [Nonempty P_x] [Nonempty P_y]
(quot_x : F → F[X]) (quot_y : F → F[X])
(h_card_Px : n_x ≤ P_x.card) (h_card_Py : n_y ≤ P_y.card)
(h_quot_x : ∀ y ∈ P_y, (quot_x y).natDegree ≤ (b_x - a_x) ∧
evalY y B = (quot_x y) * (evalY y A))
(h_quot_y : ∀ x ∈ P_x, (quot_y x).natDegree ≤ (b_y - a_y) ∧
evalX x B = (quot_y x) * (evalX x A))
(h_le_1 : 1 > (b_x : ℚ) / (n_x : ℚ) + (b_y : ℚ) / (n_y : ℚ)) :
∃ P : F[X][Y], B = P * AFormal artifact
Lean source
lemma ps_exists_p {F : Type} [Field F] (a_x a_y b_x b_y : ℕ) (n_x n_y : ℕ+) (h_bx_ge_ax : b_x ≥ a_x) (h_by_ge_ay : b_y ≥ a_y) (A B : F[X][Y]) (h_f_degX : a_x ≥ degreeX A) (h_g_degX : b_x ≥ degreeX B) (h_f_degY : a_y ≥ natDegreeY A) (h_g_degY : b_y ≥ natDegreeY B) (P_x P_y : Finset F) [Nonempty P_x] [Nonempty P_y] (quot_x : F → F[X]) (quot_y : F → F[X]) (h_card_Px : n_x ≤ P_x.card) (h_card_Py : n_y ≤ P_y.card) (h_quot_x : ∀ y ∈ P_y, (quot_x y).natDegree ≤ (b_x - a_x) ∧ evalY y B = (quot_x y) * (evalY y A)) (h_quot_y : ∀ x ∈ P_x, (quot_y x).natDegree ≤ (b_y - a_y) ∧ evalX x B = (quot_y x) * (evalX x A)) (h_le_1 : 1 > (b_x : ℚ) / (n_x : ℚ) + (b_y : ℚ) / (n_y : ℚ)) : ∃ P : F[X][Y], B = P * A := by classical letI : DecidableEq F := Classical.decEq F by_cases hB0 : B = 0 · exact ⟨0, by simp [hB0]⟩ by_cases hA0 : A = 0 · exfalso have hBx_lt_card : b_x < P_x.card := lt_of_lt_of_le (ps_bx_lt_nx h_le_1) h_card_Px have h_all_zero : ∀ x ∈ P_x, evalX x B = 0 := fun x hx ↦ by simpa [hA0, ps_eval_x_eq_map] using (h_quot_y x hx).2 have := ps_card_eval_x_eq_zero_le_degree_x B hB0 P_x rw [Finset.filter_true_of_mem h_all_zero] at this; omega · exact ps_exists_p_nonzero a_x a_y b_x b_y n_x n_y h_bx_ge_ax h_by_ge_ay A B hA0 hB0 h_f_degX h_g_degX h_f_degY h_g_degY P_x P_y quot_x quot_y h_card_Px h_card_Py h_quot_x h_quot_y h_le_1- Project
- ArkLib
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- fad5cbf80877
- Source
- ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/PolishchukSpielman/Existence.lean:275-303
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes
affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes
Project documentation
This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose coeff
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff
Plain-language statement
The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose lawful
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful
Plain-language statement
The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.