Plain-language statement
Existence of P with B = P * A when both A and B are nonzero.
Exact Lean statement
lemma ps_exists_p_nonzero {F : Type} [Field F]
(a_x a_y b_x b_y : ℕ) (n_x n_y : ℕ+)
(h_bx_ge_ax : b_x ≥ a_x) (h_by_ge_ay : b_y ≥ a_y)
(A B : F[X][Y]) (hA0 : A ≠ 0) (hB0 : B ≠ 0)
(h_f_degX : a_x ≥ degreeX A) (h_g_degX : b_x ≥ degreeX B)
(h_f_degY : a_y ≥ natDegreeY A) (h_g_degY : b_y ≥ natDegreeY B)
(P_x P_y : Finset F) [Nonempty P_x] [Nonempty P_y]
(quot_x quot_y : F → F[X])
(h_card_Px : n_x ≤ P_x.card) (h_card_Py : n_y ≤ P_y.card)
(h_quot_x : ∀ y ∈ P_y, (quot_x y).natDegree ≤ (b_x - a_x) ∧
evalY y B = (quot_x y) * (evalY y A))
(h_quot_y : ∀ x ∈ P_x, (quot_y x).natDegree ≤ (b_y - a_y) ∧
evalX x B = (quot_y x) * (evalX x A))
(h_le_1 : 1 > (b_x : ℚ) / (n_x : ℚ) + (b_y : ℚ) / (n_y : ℚ)) :
∃ P : F[X][Y], B = P * AFormal artifact
Lean source
lemma ps_exists_p_nonzero {F : Type} [Field F] (a_x a_y b_x b_y : ℕ) (n_x n_y : ℕ+) (h_bx_ge_ax : b_x ≥ a_x) (h_by_ge_ay : b_y ≥ a_y) (A B : F[X][Y]) (hA0 : A ≠ 0) (hB0 : B ≠ 0) (h_f_degX : a_x ≥ degreeX A) (h_g_degX : b_x ≥ degreeX B) (h_f_degY : a_y ≥ natDegreeY A) (h_g_degY : b_y ≥ natDegreeY B) (P_x P_y : Finset F) [Nonempty P_x] [Nonempty P_y] (quot_x quot_y : F → F[X]) (h_card_Px : n_x ≤ P_x.card) (h_card_Py : n_y ≤ P_y.card) (h_quot_x : ∀ y ∈ P_y, (quot_x y).natDegree ≤ (b_x - a_x) ∧ evalY y B = (quot_x y) * (evalY y A)) (h_quot_y : ∀ x ∈ P_x, (quot_y x).natDegree ≤ (b_y - a_y) ∧ evalX x B = (quot_y x) * (evalX x A)) (h_le_1 : 1 > (b_x : ℚ) / (n_x : ℚ) + (b_y : ℚ) / (n_y : ℚ)) : ∃ P : F[X][Y], B = P * A := by classical rcases ps_gcd_decompose (A := A) (B := B) hA0 hB0 with ⟨G, A1, B1, hA, hB, hrel, hA1, hB1⟩ have hG0 : G ≠ 0 := fun hG ↦ hA0 (by simp [hA, hG]) set g_x := degreeX G; set g_y := natDegreeY G have hdegX_A : degreeX A = g_x + degreeX A1 := by rw [hA]; simpa [g_x] using degreeX_mul G A1 hG0 hA1 have hdegY_A : natDegreeY A = g_y + natDegreeY A1 := by rw [hA]; simpa [g_y] using degreeY_mul G A1 hG0 hA1 have hdegX_B : degreeX B = g_x + degreeX B1 := by rw [hB]; simpa [g_x] using degreeX_mul G B1 hG0 hB1 have hdegY_B : natDegreeY B = g_y + natDegreeY B1 := by rw [hB]; simpa [g_y] using degreeY_mul G B1 hG0 hB1 have hbxltnx := ps_bx_lt_nx h_le_1 have hbyltny := ps_by_lt_ny h_le_1 have hgx_le_ax : g_x ≤ a_x := le_trans (by simp [hdegX_A]) h_f_degX have hgy_le_ay : g_y ≤ a_y := le_trans (by simp [hdegY_A]) h_f_degY have hgx_le_bx : g_x ≤ b_x := le_trans hgx_le_ax h_bx_ge_ax have hgy_le_by : g_y ≤ b_y := le_trans hgy_le_ay h_by_ge_ay have hx_lt_nx : g_x < (n_x : ℕ) := lt_of_le_of_lt hgx_le_bx hbxltnx have hy_lt_ny : g_y < (n_y : ℕ) := lt_of_le_of_lt hgy_le_by hbyltny let Px' := P_x.filter (fun x ↦ evalX x G ≠ 0) let Py' := P_y.filter (fun y ↦ evalY y G ≠ 0) have hcard_Px' : (n_x : ℕ) - g_x ≤ Px'.card := by have := Finset.card_filter_add_card_filter_not (s := P_x) (fun x ↦ evalX x G = 0) have := by simpa [g_x] using ps_card_eval_x_eq_zero_le_degree_x (A := G) hG0 P_x have : {a ∈ P_x | ¬evalX a G = 0}.card = Px'.card := rfl omega have hcard_Py' : (n_y : ℕ) - g_y ≤ Py'.card := by have := Finset.card_filter_add_card_filter_not (s := P_y) (fun y ↦ evalY y G = 0) have := by simpa [g_y] using ps_card_eval_y_eq_zero_le_nat_degree_y G hG0 P_y have : {a ∈ P_y | ¬evalY a G = 0}.card = Py'.card := rfl omega haveI : Nonempty Px' := ⟨⟨_, (Finset.card_pos.mp (by omega)).choose_spec⟩⟩ haveI : Nonempty Py' := ⟨⟨_, (Finset.card_pos.mp (by omega)).choose_spec⟩⟩ let ax' := a_x - g_x; let ay' := a_y - g_y let bx' := b_x - g_x; let by' := b_y - g_y let nx' : ℕ+ := ⟨(n_x : ℕ) - g_x, Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hx_lt_nx⟩ let ny' : ℕ+ := ⟨(n_y : ℕ) - g_y, Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hy_lt_ny⟩ have hdiff_x : bx' - ax' = b_x - a_x := by simpa [bx', ax'] using tsub_tsub_tsub_cancel_right hgx_le_ax have hdiff_y : by' - ay' = b_y - a_y := by simpa [by', ay'] using tsub_tsub_tsub_cancel_right hgy_le_ay have hquotX' : ∀ y ∈ Py', (quot_x y).natDegree ≤ (bx' - ax') ∧ evalY y B1 = (quot_x y) * evalY y A1 := fun y hy ↦ ⟨hdiff_x ▸ (h_quot_x y (Finset.mem_filter.mp hy).1).1, ps_descend_eval_y hA hB y (Finset.mem_filter.mp hy).2 _ (h_quot_x y (Finset.mem_filter.mp hy).1).2⟩ have hquotY' : ∀ x ∈ Px', (quot_y x).natDegree ≤ (by' - ay') ∧ evalX x B1 = (quot_y x) * evalX x A1 := fun x hx ↦ ⟨hdiff_y ▸ (h_quot_y x (Finset.mem_filter.mp hx).1).1, ps_descend_eval_x hA hB x (Finset.mem_filter.mp hx).2 _ (h_quot_y x (Finset.mem_filter.mp hx).1).2⟩ have hxfrac : (bx' : ℚ) / (nx' : ℚ) ≤ (b_x : ℚ) / (n_x : ℚ) := by have hn2 : (0 : ℚ) < (nx' : ℚ) := by exact_mod_cast nx'.pos have hbx'cast : (bx' : ℚ) = (b_x : ℚ) - g_x := by simp [bx', Nat.cast_sub hgx_le_bx] have hnx'cast : (nx' : ℚ) = (n_x : ℚ) - g_x := by simp [nx', Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt hx_lt_nx)] rw [hbx'cast, hnx'cast, div_le_div_iff₀ (by rw [hnx'cast] at hn2; exact hn2) (by exact_mod_cast n_x.pos)] nlinarith [show (b_x : ℚ) ≤ n_x from by exact_mod_cast le_of_lt hbxltnx, Nat.cast_nonneg (α := ℚ) g_x] have hyfrac : (by' : ℚ) / (ny' : ℚ) ≤ (b_y : ℚ) / (n_y : ℚ) := by have hn2 : (0 : ℚ) < (ny' : ℚ) := by exact_mod_cast ny'.pos have hby'cast : (by' : ℚ) = (b_y : ℚ) - g_y := by simp [by', Nat.cast_sub hgy_le_by] have hny'cast : (ny' : ℚ) = (n_y : ℚ) - g_y := by simp [ny', Nat.cast_sub (le_of_lt hy_lt_ny)] rw [hby'cast, hny'cast, div_le_div_iff₀ (by rw [hny'cast] at hn2; exact hn2) (by exact_mod_cast n_y.pos)] nlinarith [show (b_y : ℚ) ≤ n_y from by exact_mod_cast le_of_lt hbyltny, Nat.cast_nonneg (α := ℚ) g_y] have hconst := ps_coprime_case_constant ax' ay' bx' by' nx' ny' (by simpa [bx', ax'] using Nat.sub_le_sub_right h_bx_ge_ax g_x) (by simpa [by', ay'] using Nat.sub_le_sub_right h_by_ge_ay g_y) A1 B1 hA1 hB1 hrel (by simpa [ax', ge_iff_le] using le_tsub_of_add_le_left (show g_x + degreeX A1 ≤ a_x by simpa [hdegX_A] using h_f_degX)) (by simpa [bx', ge_iff_le] using le_tsub_of_add_le_left (show g_x + degreeX B1 ≤ b_x by simpa [hdegX_B] using h_g_degX)) (by simpa [ay', ge_iff_le] using le_tsub_of_add_le_left (show g_y + natDegreeY A1 ≤ a_y by simpa [hdegY_A] using h_f_degY)) (by simpa [by', ge_iff_le] using le_tsub_of_add_le_left (show g_y + natDegreeY B1 ≤ b_y by simpa [hdegY_B] using h_g_degY)) Px' Py' quot_x quot_y (by simpa [nx'] using hcard_Px') (by simpa [ny'] using hcard_Py') hquotX' hquotY' (lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add hxfrac hyfrac) h_le_1) rcases ps_exists_p_of_degree_x_eq_zero_nat_degree_y_eq_zero hA1 hconst.1 hconst.2 (B := B1) with ⟨P1, hB1fac⟩ exact ⟨P1, by rw [hB, hB1fac, hA]; ring⟩- Project
- ArkLib
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- fad5cbf80877
- Source
- ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/PolishchukSpielman/Existence.lean:170-272
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes
affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes
Project documentation
This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose coeff
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff
Plain-language statement
The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.
Gadget Decompose lawful
ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful
Plain-language statement
The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.
Source project: ArkLib
Person-level attribution pending.