All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · mathlib@fabf563a7c95

Split Data snd At is Structured

ProtocolSpec.ChallengeTree.SplitData.sndAt_isStructured

Plain-language statement

The suffix tree selected by any first-stage path of a structured SplitData is structured.

Exact Lean statement

theorem SplitData.sndAt_isStructured :
    {r : Fin (m + 1)} → (S : SplitData S₁.arity S₂.arity r) →
    S.src.IsStructured (S₁.append S₂) → (path : LeafPath S.fst) →
    (S.sndAt path).IsStructured S₂
  | _, .boundary rp, hS, _ => by
      have hround : leftRound (n := n) (Fin.last m) =
          rightRound (m := m) (0 : Fin (n + 1))

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
theorem SplitData.sndAt_isStructured :    {r : Fin (m + 1)}  (S : SplitData S₁.arity S₂.arity r)     S.src.IsStructured (S₁.append S₂)  (path : LeafPath S.fst)     (S.sndAt path).IsStructured S₂  | _, .boundary rp, hS, _ => by      have hround : leftRound (n := n) (Fin.last m) =          rightRound (m := m) (0 : Fin (n + 1)) := by        apply Fin.ext        simp [leftRound, rightRound]      simp only [SplitData.src] at hS      apply rp.tree_isStructured      convert hS using 1      · exact hround.symm      · rfl  | _, .msg i h m₁ child, hS, path => by      have hround : (Fin.castAdd n i).succ = leftRound i.succ := by        apply Fin.ext        rfl      simp only [SplitData.src, ChallengeTree.IsStructured] at hS      have hS' : child.src.IsStructured (S₁.append S₂) := by        convert hS using 1        · exact hround.symm        · rfl      exact SplitData.sndAt_isStructured child hS' (peelMsg path)  | _, .chal i h chals children, hS, path => by      have hApp : (pSpec₁ ++ₚ pSpec₂).dir (Fin.castAdd n i) = .V_to_P := by        simpa [ProtocolSpec.append, Fin.vappend_eq_append, Fin.append_left] using h      have hIdx : (Fin.castAdd n i, hApp : (pSpec₁ ++ₚ pSpec₂).ChallengeIdx)          = ChallengeIdx.inl i, h := by ext; rfl      have hAr : appendArity S₁.arity S₂.arity Fin.castAdd n i, hApp = S₁.arity i, h := by        rw [hIdx]; simpa [appendArity] using          congrArg (Sum.elim S₁.arity S₂.arity)            (ChallengeIdx.sumEquiv_symm_inl (pSpec₂ := pSpec₂) i, h)      have hS' := hS      simp only [SplitData.src, ChallengeTree.IsStructured] at hS'      exact SplitData.sndAt_isStructured (children (chalPeel path).1)        (hS'.2 (Fin.cast hAr.symm (chalPeel path).1)) (chalPeel path).2
Project
ArkLib
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
fad5cbf80877
Source
ArkLib/OracleReduction/Security/TranscriptTree/Composition.lean:652-688

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Affine gaps lifted to interleaved codes

affine_gaps_lifted_to_interleaved_codes

Project documentation

This lemma proves the final algebraic step in the DG25 Theorem 3.1 proof. It shows that if R > e + 1, then e * (R / (R - 1)) < e + 1. The intuition is that the fraction R / (R - 1) is always greater than 1, but as R gets larger, it gets closer to 1. The hypothesis R > e + 1 provides a strong enough bound to ensure the product e * (fraction) do...

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Gadget Decompose coeff

ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_coeff

Plain-language statement

The k-th coefficient (k < deg φ) of a gadget-decomposition block is exactly the corresponding digit of the corresponding input coefficient.

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Gadget Decompose lawful

ArkLib.Lattices.Ajtai.gadgetDecompose_lawful

Plain-language statement

The base-b gadget decomposition is a lawful gadget decomposition.

cryptographyproof systemscoding theory

Source project: ArkLib

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record