All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.24.0-rc1 · mathlib@aad26963

Da concat ptr2 exists

Automata.da_concat_ptr2_exists

Project documentation

The copy i of M2 being asserted to exist by this theorem is activated at step n and persists ever after. But i may not stay constant over time.

Exact Lean statement

theorem da_concat_ptr2_exists (as : Stream' A) (n : ℕ) (h_n : M1.DetRun as n ∈ acc1) (k : ℕ) :
    ∃ i, ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k + 1)).2 i = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) (k + 1)) ∧
      if k = 0 then
        ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i = none ∧
        ∀ j < i, (((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 j).isSome
      else
        ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) k) ∧
        ∀ j < i, ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 j ≠ ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
theorem da_concat_ptr2_exists (as : Stream' A) (n : ) (h_n : M1.DetRun as n  acc1) (k : ) :     i, ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k + 1)).2 i = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) (k + 1))       if k = 0 then        ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i = none          j < i, (((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 j).isSome      else        ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) k)          j < i, ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 j  ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k)).2 i := by  induction' k with k h_ind  . let I := {i | ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as n).2 i = none}    have h_fin : I.Finite := by exact toFinite I    have h_ne : I.Nonempty := by exact da_concat_det_run_cnt2 M1 acc1 M2 as n    obtain i, h_i, h_min := Finite.exists_minimal h_fin h_ne    simp [I] at h_i h_min    use i    simp [h_i, DA.DetRun, da_concat_next_2, da_concat_det_run_1, h_n, get_drop',  ne_none_iff_isSome]    intro j h_j h_contra ; have := h_min h_contra ; fin_omega  obtain i, h_i, _ := h_ind  let I := {j | ((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k + 1)).2 j = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) (k + 1))}  have h_fin : I.Finite := by exact toFinite I  have h_ne : I.Nonempty := by use i ; simp [I, h_i]  obtain j, h_j, h_min := Finite.exists_minimal h_fin h_ne  simp [I] at h_j h_min  use j  simp [h_j,  add_assoc]  rw [DA.DetRun]  simp [da_concat_next_2, h_j]  have h_min' :  j' < j, ¬((M1.Concat acc1 M2).DetRun as (n + k + 1)).2 j' = some (M2.DetRun (as.drop n) (k + 1)) := by    intro j' h_j' h_contra ; have := h_min h_contra ; fin_omega  constructorm* _  _  · grind  · simp [DA.DetRun, get_drop', (show n + (k + 1) = n + k + 1 by omega)]  · grind
Project
Automata Theory
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
f196548710ce
Source
AutomataTheory/Automata/DetConcat.lean:153-185

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.24.0-rc1

Acc lang congr

acc_lang_congr

Plain-language statement

The language accepted by c.toDA with a unique accepting state s is exactly the equivalence class of s.

automata theoryformal languagescomputer science

Source project: Automata Theory

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.24.0-rc1

Acc lang concat e

Automata.acc_lang_concat_e

Plain-language statement

The language of the concatenation NA that is accepted by M0's accepting states is the language accepted by M0.

automata theoryformal languagescomputer science

Source project: Automata Theory

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.24.0-rc1

Acc lang concat ne

Automata.acc_lang_concat_ne

Plain-language statement

The language of the concatenation NA that is accepted by M1's accepting states is the language accepted by M0 concatenated with the language accepted by M1 minus the empty word.

automata theoryformal languagescomputer science

Source project: Automata Theory

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record