Na concat fin run 1
Automata.na_concat_fin_run_1
Plain-language statement
A finite run of the concatenation NA that ends in a state of M1 consists of a run of M0 followed by a run of M1.
Exact Lean statement
theorem na_concat_fin_run_1 {m : ℕ} {as : Stream' A} {ss : Stream' (M0.Concat acc0 M1).State} :
(M0.Concat acc0 M1).FinRun m as ss ∧ (∃ s1, ss m = inr s1) ↔
∃ n < m, (∃ ss0, M0.FinRun n as ss0 ∧ ss0 n ∈ acc0 ∧ ∀ k < n + 1, ss k = inl (ss0 k)) ∧
(∃ ss1, M1.FinRun (m - n) (as.drop n) ss1 ∧ ∀ k ≥ n + 1, k < m + 1 → ss k = inr (ss1 (k - n)))Formal artifact
Lean source
theorem na_concat_fin_run_1 {m : ℕ} {as : Stream' A} {ss : Stream' (M0.Concat acc0 M1).State} : (M0.Concat acc0 M1).FinRun m as ss ∧ (∃ s1, ss m = inr s1) ↔ ∃ n < m, (∃ ss0, M0.FinRun n as ss0 ∧ ss0 n ∈ acc0 ∧ ∀ k < n + 1, ss k = inl (ss0 k)) ∧ (∃ ss1, M1.FinRun (m - n) (as.drop n) ss1 ∧ ∀ k ≥ n + 1, k < m + 1 → ss k = inr (ss1 (k - n))) := by constructor · rintro ⟨⟨⟨s0, h_s0_init, h_s0⟩, h_next⟩, h_sm⟩ have h_n : ∃ n s1, ss n = inr s1 := by use m use (Nat.find h_n - 1) have h_n_pos : 0 < Nat.find h_n := by by_contra have h_n_0 : Nat.find h_n = 0 := by omega obtain ⟨s1, h_s1⟩ := Nat.find_spec h_n rw [h_n_0] at h_s1 simp [← h_s0] at h_s1 have h_n_dec_inc := Nat.sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos h_n_pos have h_ss0 : ∀ k < Nat.find h_n, ∃ s0, ss k = inl s0 := by intro k h_k ; exact not_M1_state (Nat.find_min h_n h_k) choose ss0 h_ss0 using h_ss0 have h_n' : Nat.find h_n - 1 < Nat.find h_n := by omega have h_ss_n' := h_ss0 (Nat.find h_n - 1) h_n' obtain ⟨sn, h_ss_n⟩ := Nat.find_spec h_n have h_n_m := Nat.find_min' h_n h_sm have h_next_n := h_next (Nat.find h_n - 1) (by omega) simp [h_ss_n', h_ss_n, h_n_dec_inc, NA.Concat] at h_next_n obtain ⟨h_n'_acc, ⟨sn1, h_sn1_init, h_sn1_next⟩⟩ := h_next_n simp only [h_n_dec_inc] constructor <;> [skip ; constructor] . omega · use (fun k ↦ if h : k < Nat.find h_n then ss0 k h else s0) constructor <;> [constructor ; constructor] · have h_ss_0 := h_ss0 0 h_n_pos rw [← h_s0, inl.inj_iff] at h_ss_0 simpa [h_n_pos, ← h_ss_0] · intro k h_k have h_k0 : k < Nat.find h_n := by omega have h_k1 : k + 1 < Nat.find h_n := by omega have h_ss_k0 := h_ss0 k h_k0 have h_ss_k1 := h_ss0 (k + 1) h_k1 have h_next_k := h_next k (by omega) simp [h_ss_k0, h_ss_k1, NA.Concat] at h_next_k simpa [h_k0, h_k1] · simpa [h_n'] · intro k h_k ; simp [h_k, h_ss0 k h_k] · have h_ss1 : ∀ k < m - Nat.find h_n + 1, ∃ s1, ss (k + Nat.find h_n) = inr s1 := by intro k h_k ; induction' k with k k_ind · use sn ; simpa obtain ⟨sk, h_sk⟩ := k_ind (by omega) have h_next_k := h_next (k + Nat.find h_n) (by omega) simp [h_sk, NA.Concat] at h_next_k rcases h_next_k with ⟨sk1, _, h_sk1⟩ use sk1 ; rw [h_sk1] ; congr 1 ; omega choose ss1 h_ss1 using h_ss1 use (fun k ↦ if k = 0 then sn1 else if h : k < m - Nat.find h_n + 2 then ss1 (k - 1) (by omega) else sn1) constructor <;> [constructor ; skip] · simpa · intro k h_k_m rcases (by omega : k = 0 ∨ k ≠ 0) with h_k | h_k · have h_ss_n'' := h_ss1 0 simp [h_ss_n] at h_ss_n'' rw [inr.inj_iff] at h_ss_n'' simpa [get_drop', h_k, ← h_ss_n''] · have h_k0 : k - 1 + Nat.find h_n + 1 = k + Nat.find h_n := by omega have h_next_k := h_next (k - 1 + Nat.find h_n) (by omega) simp [NA.Concat, h_k0, h_ss1 (k - 1) (by omega)] at h_next_k obtain ⟨sk1, h_sk1_next, h_sk1⟩ := h_next_k have h_k1 : k < m - Nat.find h_n + 1 := by omega have h_k2 : k < m - Nat.find h_n + 2 := by omega have h_k3 : (Nat.find h_n - 1) + k = (k - 1) + Nat.find h_n := by omega rw [h_ss1 k (by omega), inr.inj_iff] at h_sk1 simpa [get_drop', h_k, h_k1, h_k2, h_k3, ← h_sk1] · intro k h_k h_k_m have h_k1 : k - (Nat.find h_n - 1) ≠ 0 := by omega have h_k2 : (k - (Nat.find h_n - 1) - 1) = k - Nat.find h_n := by omega have h_k3 : k - (Nat.find h_n - 1) < m - Nat.find h_n + 2 := by omega simp [h_k1, h_k2, h_k3, ← h_ss1 (k - Nat.find h_n)] congr ; omega · rintro ⟨n, h_n, ⟨ss0, ⟨h_init0, h_next0⟩, h_acc0, h_ss0⟩, ⟨ss1, ⟨h_init1, h_next1⟩, h_ss1⟩⟩ constructor <;> [constructor ; skip] · simpa [h_ss0 0 (by omega), NA.Concat] · intro k h_k' rcases (by omega : k < n ∨ k = n ∨ k > n) with h_k | h_k | h_k · have h_next_k := h_next0 k h_k simpa [h_ss0 k (by omega), h_ss0 (k + 1) (by omega), NA.Concat] · obtain ⟨rfl⟩ := h_k have h_next_k := h_next1 0 (by omega) simp [get_drop'] at h_next_k simp [h_ss0 n (by omega), h_ss1 (n + 1) (by omega) (by omega), NA.Concat, h_acc0] use (ss1 0) · have h_next_k := h_next1 (k - n) (by omega) simp [get_drop', (by omega : n + (k - n) = k), (by omega : k - n + 1 = k + 1 - n)] at h_next_k simpa [h_ss1 k (by omega) (by omega), h_ss1 (k + 1) (by omega) (by omega), NA.Concat] . have := h_ss1 m (by omega) (by omega) use (ss1 (m - n))- Project
- Automata Theory
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- f196548710ce
- Source
- AutomataTheory/Automata/Concat.lean:96-188
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Acc lang congr
acc_lang_congr
Plain-language statement
The language accepted by c.toDA with a unique accepting state s is exactly the equivalence class of s.
Source project: Automata Theory
Person-level attribution pending.
Acc lang concat e
Automata.acc_lang_concat_e
Plain-language statement
The language of the concatenation NA that is accepted by M0's accepting states is the language accepted by M0.
Source project: Automata Theory
Person-level attribution pending.
Acc lang concat ne
Automata.acc_lang_concat_ne
Plain-language statement
The language of the concatenation NA that is accepted by M1's accepting states is the language accepted by M0 concatenated with the language accepted by M1 minus the empty word.
Source project: Automata Theory
Person-level attribution pending.