Plain-language statement
Let , let be its Hölder conjugate, and suppose the linearized nontangential operators have the required uniform bound. For bounded measurable and measurable with , the supremum over all truncated scale intervals satisfies
Exact Lean statement
lemma S_truncation
[IsCancellative X (defaultτ a)] {B : ℕ} (hq : q ∈ Ioc 1 2) (hqq' : q.HolderConjugate q')
(bF : IsBounded F) (bG : IsBounded G) (mF : MeasurableSet F) (mG : MeasurableSet G)
(mf : Measurable f) (nf : (‖f ·‖) ≤ F.indicator 1)
(BST_T_Q : ∀ θ : Θ X, HasBoundedStrongType (linearizedNontangentialOperator Q θ K · ·)
2 2 volume volume (C_Ts a)) :
∫⁻ x in G, ⨆ s₁ ∈ Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B, ⨆ s₂ ∈ Finset.Icc s₁ B, ‖T_S Q s₁ s₂ f x‖ₑ ≤
C3_0_4 a q * volume G ^ (q' : ℝ)⁻¹ * volume F ^ (q : ℝ)⁻¹Formal artifact
Lean source
lemma S_truncation [IsCancellative X (defaultτ a)] {B : ℕ} (hq : q ∈ Ioc 1 2) (hqq' : q.HolderConjugate q') (bF : IsBounded F) (bG : IsBounded G) (mF : MeasurableSet F) (mG : MeasurableSet G) (mf : Measurable f) (nf : (‖f ·‖) ≤ F.indicator 1) (BST_T_Q : ∀ θ : Θ X, HasBoundedStrongType (linearizedNontangentialOperator Q θ K · ·) 2 2 volume volume (C_Ts a)) : ∫⁻ x in G, ⨆ s₁ ∈ Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B, ⨆ s₂ ∈ Finset.Icc s₁ B, ‖T_S Q s₁ s₂ f x‖ₑ ≤ C3_0_4 a q * volume G ^ (q' : ℝ)⁻¹ * volume F ^ (q : ℝ)⁻¹ := by -- Define `T1'` and `T1` and prove their measurability let T1' (x : X) (s' : ℤ) := ⨆ s₂ ∈ Finset.Icc s' B, ‖T_S Q s' s₂ f x‖ₑ have mT1' {n : ℤ} : Measurable (T1' · n) := Measurable.iSup fun _ ↦ Measurable.iSup fun _ ↦ (measurable_T_S mf).enorm let T1 (x : X) := ⨆ s₁ ∈ Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B, T1' x s₁ have mT1 : Measurable T1 := Measurable.iSup fun _ ↦ Measurable.iSup fun _ ↦ mT1' -- For each `x` define a candidate set of values for `σ₁ x`; -- the final value is the minimum in this set. Also prove measurability of membership let candσ₁ (x : X) := (Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B).filter (T1 x = T1' x ·) have necσ₁ (x : X) : (candσ₁ x).Nonempty := by rw [Finset.filter_nonempty_iff] obtain ⟨s', ms', hs'⟩ := (Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B).exists_max_image (T1' x) ⟨0, by simp⟩ use s', ms'; apply le_antisymm · exact iSup₂_le hs' · apply le_biSup _ ms' have scσ₁ (x : X) : candσ₁ x ⊆ Finset.Icc (-B) B := by simp [candσ₁] have mcσ₁ {n : ℤ} : Measurable (n ∈ candσ₁ ·) := by simp_rw [candσ₁, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_Icc] apply measurable_const.and; rw [← measurableSet_setOf]; exact measurableSet_eq_fun mT1 mT1' -- Define `σ₁` and prove its measurability and finite range let σ₁ (x : X) := (candσ₁ x).min' (necσ₁ x) have eσ₁ (x : X) : σ₁ x ∈ candσ₁ x := (candσ₁ x).min'_mem (necσ₁ x) have minσ₁ (x : X) {n : ℤ} (hn : n ∈ candσ₁ x) : σ₁ x ≤ n := (candσ₁ x).min'_le _ hn have mσ₁ : Measurable σ₁ := by classical refine measurable_to_countable' fun n ↦ ?_ have eqv : σ₁ ⁻¹' {n} = candσ₁ ⁻¹' ((Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B).powerset.filter fun c ↦ n ∈ c ∧ ∀ m ∈ c, n ≤ m) := by ext x simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, Finset.coe_filter, Finset.mem_powerset, mem_setOf_eq, scσ₁, true_and] constructor <;> intro h · rw [← h]; exact ⟨eσ₁ x, fun m ↦ minσ₁ x⟩ · rw [← (candσ₁ x).le_min'_iff (necσ₁ x)] at h; obtain ⟨h₁, h₂ : n ≤ σ₁ x⟩ := h exact le_antisymm ((candσ₁ x).min'_le _ h₁) h₂ simp_rw [eqv, Finset.coe_filter, Finset.mem_powerset, preimage_setOf_eq, measurableSet_setOf] refine Measurable.and ?_ (mcσ₁.and (Measurable.forall fun m ↦ mcσ₁.imp measurable_const)) simp [scσ₁] have rσ₁ : (range σ₁).Finite := by suffices range σ₁ ⊆ Set.Icc (-B) B by exact (finite_Icc (-B : ℤ) B).subset this simp_rw [range_subset_iff, mem_Icc, ← Finset.mem_Icc]; exact fun x ↦ scσ₁ x (eσ₁ x) -- Incorporate `σ₁` into the main integral simp_rw [candσ₁, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_Icc] at eσ₁ change ∫⁻ x in G, T1 x ≤ _ conv_lhs => enter [2, x]; rw [(eσ₁ x).2] -- Work analogously to define `σ₂` let candσ₂ (x : X) := (Finset.Icc (σ₁ x) B).filter (fun s'' : ℤ ↦ T1' x (σ₁ x) = ‖T_S Q (σ₁ x) s'' f x‖ₑ) have necσ₂ (x : X) : (candσ₂ x).Nonempty := by rw [Finset.filter_nonempty_iff] obtain ⟨s', ms', hs'⟩ := (Finset.Icc (σ₁ x) B).exists_max_image (‖T_S Q (σ₁ x) · f x‖ₑ) ⟨σ₁ x, by simpa using (eσ₁ x).1.2⟩ use s', ms'; apply le_antisymm · exact iSup₂_le hs' · apply le_biSup _ ms' have scσ₂ (x : X) : candσ₂ x ⊆ Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B := subset_trans (by simp [candσ₂]) (Finset.Icc_subset_Icc_left (eσ₁ x).1.1) have mcσ₂ {n : ℤ} : Measurable (n ∈ candσ₂ ·) := by simp_rw [candσ₂, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_Icc] apply Measurable.and · apply Measurable.and ?_ measurable_const rw [← measurableSet_setOf]; exact measurableSet_le mσ₁ measurable_const · rw [← measurableSet_setOf]; apply measurableSet_eq_fun · apply Measurable.comp (f := fun x ↦ (x, σ₁ x)) (g := fun p ↦ T1' p.1 p.2) · exact measurable_from_prod_countable_left fun _ ↦ mT1' · exact measurable_id.prodMk mσ₁ · apply Measurable.enorm apply (Measurable.comp (f := fun x ↦ (x, σ₁ x)) (g := fun p ↦ T_S Q p.2 n f p.1)) · exact measurable_from_prod_countable_left fun _ ↦ measurable_T_S mf · exact measurable_id.prodMk mσ₁ -- Work analogously to prove `σ₂`'s properties let σ₂ (x : X) := (candσ₂ x).min' (necσ₂ x) have eσ₂ (x : X) : σ₂ x ∈ candσ₂ x := (candσ₂ x).min'_mem (necσ₂ x) have minσ₂ (x : X) {n : ℤ} (hn : n ∈ candσ₂ x) : σ₂ x ≤ n := (candσ₂ x).min'_le _ hn have mσ₂ : Measurable σ₂ := by classical refine measurable_to_countable' fun n ↦ ?_ have eqv : σ₂ ⁻¹' {n} = candσ₂ ⁻¹' ((Finset.Icc (-B : ℤ) B).powerset.filter fun c ↦ n ∈ c ∧ ∀ m ∈ c, n ≤ m) := by ext x simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_singleton_iff, Finset.coe_filter, Finset.mem_powerset, mem_setOf_eq, scσ₂, true_and] constructor <;> intro h · rw [← h]; exact ⟨eσ₂ x, fun m ↦ minσ₂ x⟩ · rw [← (candσ₂ x).le_min'_iff (necσ₂ x)] at h; obtain ⟨h₁, h₂ : n ≤ σ₂ x⟩ := h exact le_antisymm ((candσ₂ x).min'_le _ h₁) h₂ simp_rw [eqv, Finset.coe_filter, Finset.mem_powerset, preimage_setOf_eq, measurableSet_setOf] refine Measurable.and ?_ (mcσ₂.and (Measurable.forall fun m ↦ mcσ₂.imp measurable_const)) simp [scσ₂] have rσ₂ : (range σ₂).Finite := by suffices range σ₂ ⊆ Set.Icc (-B) B by exact (finite_Icc (-B : ℤ) B).subset this simp_rw [range_subset_iff, mem_Icc, ← Finset.mem_Icc]; exact fun x ↦ scσ₂ x (eσ₂ x) simp_rw [candσ₂, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_Icc] at eσ₂ have lσ : σ₁ ≤ σ₂ := by intro x; exact (eσ₂ x).1.1 -- Complete the reduction conv_lhs => enter [2, x]; rw [(eσ₂ x).2] exact linearized_truncation hq hqq' bF bG mF mG mf nf mσ₁ mσ₂ rσ₁ rσ₂ lσ BST_T_Q- Project
- Carleson formalization
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- 74ef907d6bdb
- Source
- Carleson/MetricCarleson/Truncation.lean:261-365
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Adjoint Carleson adjoint
adjointCarleson_adjoint
Plain-language statement
adjointCarleson is the adjoint of carlesonOn.
Source project: Carleson formalization
Person-level attribution pending.
Ae tendsto zero of distribution le
ae_tendsto_zero_of_distribution_le
Plain-language statement
Suppose that, for every error threshold and every measure tolerance , one can choose so that the set where exceeds has measure at most . Then converges to for almost every .
Source project: Carleson formalization
Person-level attribution pending.
Antichain operator
antichain_operator
Plain-language statement
For an antichain of pairwise incomparable tiles, and measurable functions and bounded by the indicators of and , the pairing of with the Carleson sum over is controlled by the norms of and and by positive powers of the two tile-density parameters. Concretely, the bound is
Source project: Carleson formalization
Person-level attribution pending.