All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · null

Compile interpret

Cedar.Thm.compile_interpret

Project documentation

The lemma shows that interpret and compile can be applied in any order to get the same result. In particular, let x be an expression, εnv a well-formed symbolic environment for x, and I a well-formed interpretion for εnv. Then, compiling x with respect to (εnv.interpret I) gives the same result as interpreting the output of compiling x...

Exact Lean statement

theorem compile_interpret {x : Expr} {εnv : SymEnv} {I : Interpretation} {t : Term} :
  I.WellFormed εnv.entities →
  εnv.WellFormedFor x →
  compile x εnv = .ok t →
  compile x (εnv.interpret I) = .ok (t.interpret I)

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
theorem compile_interpret {x : Expr} {εnv : SymEnv} {I : Interpretation} {t : Term} :  I.WellFormed εnv.entities   εnv.WellFormedFor x   compile x εnv = .ok t   compile x (εnv.interpret I) = .ok (t.interpret I):= by  intros h₁ h₂ h₃  match x with  | .lit _             => exact compile_interpret_lit h₃  | .var _             => exact compile_interpret_var h₁ h₂ h₃  | .ite x₁ x₂ x₃      =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    have ih₂ := @compile_interpret x₂    have ih₃ := @compile_interpret x₃    exact compile_interpret_ite h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁ ih₂ ih₃  | .and x₁ x₂         =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    have ih₂ := @compile_interpret x₂    exact compile_interpret_and h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁ ih₂  | .or x₁ x₂          =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    have ih₂ := @compile_interpret x₂    exact compile_interpret_or h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁ ih₂  | .unaryApp _ x₁     =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    exact compile_interpret_unaryApp h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁  | .binaryApp _ x₁ x₂ =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    have ih₂ := @compile_interpret x₂    exact compile_interpret_binaryApp h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁ ih₂  | .getAttr x₁ _      =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    exact compile_interpret_getAttr h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁  | .hasAttr x₁ _      =>    have ih₁ := @compile_interpret x₁    exact compile_interpret_hasAttr h₁ h₂ h₃ ih₁  | .set xs            =>    have ih :  xᵢ  xs, CompileInterpret xᵢ := by      intro xᵢ _      exact @compile_interpret xᵢ    exact compile_interpret_set h₁ h₂ h₃ ih  | .record axs      =>    have ih :  aᵢ xᵢ, (aᵢ, xᵢ)  axs  CompileInterpret xᵢ := by      intro aᵢ xᵢ h      have _ : sizeOf xᵢ < 1 + sizeOf axs := List.sizeOf_snd_lt_sizeOf_list h      exact @compile_interpret xᵢ    exact compile_interpret_record h₁ h₂ h₃ ih  | .call _ xs       =>    have ih :  xᵢ  xs, CompileInterpret xᵢ := by      intro xᵢ _      exact @compile_interpret xᵢ    exact compile_interpret_call h₁ h₂ h₃ ih
Project
Cedar Specification
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
3f093947b8ae
Source
cedar-lean/Cedar/Thm/SymCC/Compiler.lean:108-159

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? ext

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_ext

Plain-language statement

Two well-formed maps are equal if they have the same find? for every key.

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? notmem keys

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_notmem_keys

Plain-language statement

Inverse of find?_mem_toList, except that this requires wf

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? some iff in values

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_some_iff_in_values

Plain-language statement

The mp direction of this does not need the wf precondition and, in fact, is available separately as find?_some_implies_in_values above

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record