All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · null

Record value contains evaluated attrs

Cedar.Thm.record_value_contains_evaluated_attrs

Plain-language statement

If evaluating a record produces a record value containing an attribute, then that attribute existed in the original record, and corresponding expression evaluates to the same value.

Exact Lean statement

theorem record_value_contains_evaluated_attrs {rxs : List (Attr × Expr)} {rvs : Map Attr Value} {a : Attr} {av : Value} {request : Request} {entities : Entities}
  (he : evaluate (.record rxs) request entities = .ok (.record rvs))
  (hfv : rvs.find? a = some av) :
  ∃ x, (Map.make rxs).find? a = some x ∧ evaluate x request entities = .ok av

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
theorem record_value_contains_evaluated_attrs {rxs : List (Attr × Expr)} {rvs : Map Attr Value} {a : Attr} {av : Value} {request : Request} {entities : Entities}  (he : evaluate (.record rxs) request entities = .ok (.record rvs))  (hfv : rvs.find? a = some av) :   x, (Map.make rxs).find? a = some x  evaluate x request entities = .ok av:= by  simp only [evaluate] at he  cases he₁ : rxs.mapMfun x => bindAttr x.1.fst (evaluate x.1.snd request entities) <;>    simp only [he₁, Except.bind_err, reduceCtorEq, Except.bind_ok, Except.ok.injEq, Value.record.injEq] at he  subst rvs  rename_i rvs'  replace he₁ : List.Forallᵥ (λ x y => evaluate x request entities = Except.ok y) rxs rvs' := by    simp only [List.forallᵥ_def]    rw [List.mapM₂_eq_mapM λ (x : Attr × Expr) => bindAttr x.fst (evaluate x.snd request entities)] at he₁    rw [List.mapM_ok_iff_forall₂] at he₁    apply List.Forall₂.imp _ he₁    intro x y h    simp only [bindAttr] at h    simp_do_let (evaluate x.snd request entities) as hx at h    simp only [pure, Except.pure, Except.ok.injEq] at h    simp only [h, and_self]  replace he₁ := List.canonicalize_preserves_forallᵥ _ _ _ he₁  have hfv : List.find? (λ x => x.fst == a) (Map.make rvs').toList = some (a, av) := by    simp only [Map.find?] at hfv    split at hfv <;> simp only [Option.some.injEq, reduceCtorEq] at hfv    subst hfv    rename_i a' _ hfv    rw [(by simpa using List.find?_some hfv : a' = a)] at hfv    exact hfv  rw [List.forallᵥ_def] at he₁  rw [Map.toList_make_eq_canonicalize] at hfv  have (a', x), he₂, he₃ := List.forall₂_implies_all_right he₁ (a, av) (List.mem_of_find?_eq_some hfv)  simp only at he₃ ; replace _, he₃ := he₃ ; subst a'  exists x  simp [Map.find?, Map.toList_make_eq_canonicalize, List.mem_of_sortedBy_implies_find? he₂ (List.canonicalize_sortedBy _ _), he₃]
Project
Cedar Specification
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
3f093947b8ae
Source
cedar-lean/Cedar/Thm/Authorization/Evaluator.lean:236-269

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? ext

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_ext

Plain-language statement

Two well-formed maps are equal if they have the same find? for every key.

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? notmem keys

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_notmem_keys

Plain-language statement

Inverse of find?_mem_toList, except that this requires wf

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? some iff in values

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_some_iff_in_values

Plain-language statement

The mp direction of this does not need the wf precondition and, in fact, is available separately as find?_some_implies_in_values above

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record