All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · null

Well Typed Policy ok implies exists typed exprs

Cedar.Thm.wellTypedPolicy_ok_implies_exists_typed_exprs

Plain-language statement

Reduces wellTypedPolicy being ok to the existence of TypedExprs.

Exact Lean statement

theorem wellTypedPolicy_ok_implies_exists_typed_exprs
  {Γ : TypeEnv} {p p' : Policy}
  (hwt : wellTypedPolicy p Γ = .ok p') :
  ∃ tx tx' : TypedExpr, ∃ c,
    TypedExpr.WellTyped Γ tx.liftBoolTypes ∧
    TypedExpr.WellTyped Γ tx' ∧
    typeOf (substituteAction Γ.reqty.action p.toExpr) ∅ Γ = Except.ok (tx, c) ∧
    p'.toExpr = tx'.toExpr ∧
    tx' =
      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))
      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))
      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))
        tx.liftBoolTypes
      (.bool .anyBool))
      (.bool .anyBool))
      (.bool .anyBool)) ∧
    tx.liftBoolTypes.typeOf = .bool .anyBool

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
theorem wellTypedPolicy_ok_implies_exists_typed_exprs  {Γ : TypeEnv} {p p' : Policy}  (hwt : wellTypedPolicy p Γ = .ok p') :   tx tx' : TypedExpr,  c,    TypedExpr.WellTyped Γ tx.liftBoolTypes     TypedExpr.WellTyped Γ tx'     typeOf (substituteAction Γ.reqty.action p.toExpr) ∅ Γ = Except.ok (tx, c)     p'.toExpr = tx'.toExpr     tx' =      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))      (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))        tx.liftBoolTypes      (.bool .anyBool))      (.bool .anyBool))      (.bool .anyBool))     tx.liftBoolTypes.typeOf = .bool .anyBool:= by  simp only [wellTypedPolicy, bind, Except.bind] at hwt  split at hwt  contradiction  rename_i tx hwt  simp only [Except.ok.injEq] at hwt ; subst p'  simp only [typecheckPolicy] at hwt  split at hwt  · rename_i tx' c hty    split at hwt    · rename_i hwt_bool      have hwf_lift := typechecked_is_well_typed_after_lifting hty      simp only [Except.ok.injEq] at hwt ; subst tx'      have :        tx.liftBoolTypes.typeOf = .bool .anyBool      := by        have := lifted_type_is_top hwt_bool        simp only [type_of_after_lifted_is_lifted] at this        simp only [this, CedarType.liftBoolTypes, BoolType.lift]      -- Construct a `TypedExpr` for the condition      -- TODO: this has likely been done somewhere else?      generalize htx'' :        (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))        (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))        (TypedExpr.and (TypedExpr.lit (Prim.bool true) (.bool .anyBool))          tx.liftBoolTypes        (.bool .anyBool))        (.bool .anyBool))        (.bool .anyBool)) = tx''      have hwf_tx'' : TypedExpr.WellTyped Γ tx'' := by        simp only [htx'']        constructor        · repeat constructor        · constructor          · repeat constructor          · constructor            · repeat constructor            · exact hwf_lift            · repeat constructor            · exact this          · rfl          · rfl        · rfl        · rfl      exists tx, tx'', c      simp only [        hwf_lift, hwf_tx'', hty, htx'', this,        true_and, and_true,      ]      simp only [        Policy.toExpr,        Scope.toExpr,        PrincipalScope.toExpr,        ActionScope.toExpr,        ResourceScope.toExpr,        Conditions.toExpr,        Condition.toExpr,        List.foldl,        List.reverse,        List.reverseAux,        TypedExpr.toExpr,        htx'',        type_lifting_preserves_expr tx,      ]    · contradiction  · contradiction
Project
Cedar Specification
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
3f093947b8ae
Source
cedar-lean/Cedar/Thm/SymCC/WellTyped.lean:35-117

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? ext

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_ext

Plain-language statement

Two well-formed maps are equal if they have the same find? for every key.

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? notmem keys

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_notmem_keys

Plain-language statement

Inverse of find?_mem_toList, except that this requires wf

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Find? some iff in values

Cedar.Data.Map.find?_some_iff_in_values

Plain-language statement

The mp direction of this does not need the wf precondition and, in fact, is available separately as find?_some_implies_in_values above

authorizationprogram verificationsemantics

Source project: Cedar Specification

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record