Compile ok implies compile well typed binary App
compile_ok_implies_compile_well_typed_binaryApp
Project documentation
Since we have the nice lemma compileApp₂_wf_types, it's enough to prove that compile of a binaryApp succeeds.
Exact Lean statement
theorem compile_ok_implies_compile_well_typed_binaryApp
{op : BinaryOp} {a : TypedExpr} {b : TypedExpr} {ty : CedarType}
{Γ : TypeEnv} {εnv : SymEnv}
(iha : CompileWellTypedAndWF a εnv)
(ihb : CompileWellTypedAndWF b εnv)
(hcond : CompileWellTypedCondition (.binaryApp op a b ty) Γ εnv)
(hok : ∃ t : Term,
compile (TypedExpr.toExpr (.binaryApp op a b ty)) εnv = .ok t) :
CompileWellTyped (.binaryApp op a b ty) εnvFormal artifact
Lean source
theorem compile_ok_implies_compile_well_typed_binaryApp {op : BinaryOp} {a : TypedExpr} {b : TypedExpr} {ty : CedarType} {Γ : TypeEnv} {εnv : SymEnv} (iha : CompileWellTypedAndWF a εnv) (ihb : CompileWellTypedAndWF b εnv) (hcond : CompileWellTypedCondition (.binaryApp op a b ty) Γ εnv) (hok : ∃ t : Term, compile (TypedExpr.toExpr (.binaryApp op a b ty)) εnv = .ok t) : CompileWellTyped (.binaryApp op a b ty) εnv:= by have ⟨hεnv, hwt_binary, ⟨hwf_εnv, hrefs_binary⟩⟩ := hcond have ⟨hwf_req, hwf_ent⟩ := hwf_εnv have ⟨tcomp_a, hcomp_a, hty_comp_a, hwf_comp_a⟩ := iha have ⟨tcomp_b, hcomp_b, hty_comp_b, hwf_comp_b⟩ := ihb have ⟨hwf_get_comp_a, hty_get_comp_a⟩ := wf_option_get hwf_comp_a hty_comp_a have ⟨hwf_get_comp_b, hty_get_comp_b⟩ := wf_option_get hwf_comp_b hty_comp_b have ⟨t, hok⟩ := hok have htypes := compile_binaryApp_wf_types hwf_ent hcomp_a hcomp_b hwf_get_comp_a hwf_get_comp_b hok cases hwt_binary with | binaryApp _ _ hopwt => cases hopwt -- Simplify and resolve most goals all_goals simp only [ CompileWellTyped, TypedExpr.toExpr, TypedExpr.typeOf, TermType.ofType, ] simp only [TypedExpr.toExpr] at hok simp only [exists_and_left] at htypes simp only [hok, Except.ok.injEq, exists_eq_left', htypes] -- Special case for `getTag` case getTag _ ety tags htag hty_a hty_b _ _ => have ⟨ety2, hty_get_comp_a2, τs, hτag, hτag_ty⟩ := htypes rw [← ofType_eq_ofType_liftBool] have ⟨τs2, hτag2, hτag_ty2⟩ := ofEnv_preserves_tags htag have heq_ety : ety = ety2 := by simp [hty_get_comp_a, hty_a, TermType.ofType] at hty_get_comp_a2 assumption have hτs : τs = τs2 := by simp [← hεnv, heq_ety, hτag] at hτag2 assumption simp [← hτag_ty2, hτag_ty, hτs]- Project
- Cedar Specification
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- 3f093947b8ae
- Source
- cedar-lean/Cedar/Thm/SymCC/Compiler/WellTyped.lean:688-728
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Find? ext
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_ext
Plain-language statement
Two well-formed maps are equal if they have the same find? for every key.
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.
Find? notmem keys
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_notmem_keys
Plain-language statement
Inverse of find?_mem_toList, except that this requires wf
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.
Find? some iff in values
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_some_iff_in_values
Plain-language statement
The mp direction of this does not need the wf precondition and, in fact, is available separately as find?_some_implies_in_values above
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.