Opt compile correctness binary App
Cedar.Thm.Opt.compile.correctness.binaryApp
Project documentation
Correctness theorem for Opt.compile -- binaryApp case
Exact Lean statement
theorem Opt.compile.correctness.binaryApp (op : BinaryOp) (x₁ x₂ : Expr) (εnv : SymEnv) :
Opt.compile (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv = (do
let term ← SymCC.compile (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv
let footprint := footprint (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv
.ok { term, footprint }
)Formal artifact
Lean source
theorem Opt.compile.correctness.binaryApp (op : BinaryOp) (x₁ x₂ : Expr) (εnv : SymEnv) : Opt.compile (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv = (do let term ← SymCC.compile (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv let footprint := footprint (.binaryApp op x₁ x₂) εnv .ok { term, footprint } ):= by simp [Opt.compile, SymCC.compile, footprint] rw [Opt.compile.correctness x₁ εnv, Opt.compile.correctness x₂ εnv] cases h₁ : SymCC.compile x₁ εnv <;> simp case ok t₁ => cases h₂ : SymCC.compile x₂ εnv <;> simp case ok t₂ => rw [Opt.compileApp₂.correctness op] simp [Opt.CompileResult.mapTerm] cases h : SymCC.compileApp₂ op (Factory.option.get t₁) (Factory.option.get t₂) εnv.entities <;> simp case ok t => rw [Opt.directFootprint.correctness (t := Factory.ifSome t₁ (Factory.ifSome t₂ t)) (εnv := εnv) (x := .binaryApp op x₁ x₂)] · conv => rhs ; rw [Data.Set.union_assoc, Data.Set.union_comm] · -- here we have to show that the `t` and `x` arguments we chose for `Opt.directFootprint.correctness` in the `rw` above correspond to each other correctly simp [SymCC.compile, h₁, h₂, h]- Project
- Cedar Specification
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- 3f093947b8ae
- Source
- cedar-lean/Cedar/Thm/SymCC/Opt/Compiler.lean:873-893
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Find? ext
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_ext
Plain-language statement
Two well-formed maps are equal if they have the same find? for every key.
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.
Find? notmem keys
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_notmem_keys
Plain-language statement
Inverse of find?_mem_toList, except that this requires wf
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.
Find? some iff in values
Cedar.Data.Map.find?_some_iff_in_values
Plain-language statement
The mp direction of this does not need the wf precondition and, in fact, is available separately as find?_some_implies_in_values above
Source project: Cedar Specification
Person-level attribution pending.