All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.33.0-rc1 · mathlib@6c5a9081e9b7

Tate Theorem lemma 2

Rep.split.TateTheorem_lemma_2

Plain-language statement

For any subgroup H of G, the connecting hommorphism in the splitting module long exact sequence H¹(H,aug) ⟶ H²(H,M) is an isomorphism.

Exact Lean statement

lemma TateTheorem_lemma_2 [FiniteClassFormation σ] [Finite H] :
    IsIso (δ (res_isShortExact σ φ) 1 2 rfl)

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
lemma TateTheorem_lemma_2 [FiniteClassFormation σ] [Finite H] :    IsIso (δ (res_isShortExact σ φ) 1 2 rfl) := by  cases nonempty_fintype H  let e₁ : groupCohomology (aug R G ↓ φ) 1 ≅ .of R (R ⧸ Ideal.span {(Nat.card H : R)}) :=    Rep.aug.H1_iso' R G inj  let e₂' : (R ⧸ Ideal.span {(Nat.card H : R)}) ≃ₗ[R] groupCohomology (M ↓ φ) 2 :=    .ofBijective (Submodule.liftQ _ (.toSpanSingleton _ _ (σ ↡ φ))      (by rw [ FiniteClassFormation.hypothesis₂' σ inj])) <| by    constructor    · rw [ LinearMap.ker_eq_bot, Submodule.ker_liftQ,  FiniteClassFormation.hypothesis₂' σ inj,        Submodule.mkQ_map_self]    · rw [ LinearMap.range_eq_top, Submodule.range_liftQ, LinearMap.range_toSpanSingleton,        FiniteClassFormation.hypothesis₂ σ inj]  let e₂ : groupCohomology (M ↓ φ) 2 ≅ .of R (R ⧸ Ideal.span {(Nat.card H : R)}) :=    e₂'.symm.toModuleIso  refine @IsIso.of_isIso_comp_right _ _ _ _ _ _ e₂.hom _ <|    @IsIso.of_isIso_comp_left _ _ _ _ _ e₁.inv _ _ ?_  suffices Function.Surjective (e₁.inv ≫ δ (res_isShortExact σ φ) 1 2 rfl ≫ e₂.hom) by    rw [ConcreteCategory.isIso_iff_bijective]    refine OrzechProperty.injective_of_surjective_endomorphism _ this, this  suffices Function.Surjective (δ (res_isShortExact σ φ) 1 2 rfl) from    e₂.toLinearEquiv.surjective.comp (this.comp e₁.toLinearEquiv.symm.surjective)  rw [ ModuleCat.epi_iff_surjective]  let S := HomologicalComplex.HomologySequence.snakeInput    (map_cochainsFunctor_shortExact <| res_isShortExact (R := R) σ φ) 1 2 rfl  exact S.L₂'_exact.epi_f_iff.mpr (TateTheorem_lemma_1 _ inj)
Project
Class Field Theory
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
f18cd7fd1575
Source
ClassFieldTheory/Cohomology/SplittingModule.lean:301-326

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.33.0-rc1

Exists of surjective

groupCohomology.exists_of_surjective

Plain-language statement

Given map f: M ⟶ N and q : ℕ, if H^{q+1}(M) ⟶ H^{q+1}(N) is surjective, then any z : Z^{q+1}(N) can be written as f(z') + d(y) for some z' : Z^{q+1}(M) and y : C^q(M). Note that d is spelled as toCocycles.

number theoryclass field theorylocal fields

Source project: Class Field Theory

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record