Stampacchia 1d
DeGiorgi.stampacchia_1d
Plain-language statement
1D Stampacchia for W^{1,1}: the weak derivative g vanishes a.e. on {u = 0}. Proof: replace u by its AC representative F (from w11_ae_eq_ac_representative). Then F' = g a.e. by the FTC. Apply deriv_eq_zero_ae_on_zeroSet to F.
Exact Lean statement
theorem stampacchia_1d {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {u g : ℝ → ℝ}
(hu : IntegrableOn u (Ioo a b) volume)
(hg : IntegrableOn g (Ioo a b) volume)
(hweak : ∀ φ : ℝ → ℝ, ContDiff ℝ (⊤ : ℕ∞) φ → HasCompactSupport φ →
tsupport φ ⊆ Ioo a b →
∫ x in Ioo a b, u x * deriv φ x = -∫ x in Ioo a b, g x * φ x) :
∀ᵐ x ∂(volume.restrict (Ioo a b)), u x = 0 → g x = 0Formal artifact
Lean source
theorem stampacchia_1d {a b : ℝ} (hab : a < b) {u g : ℝ → ℝ} (hu : IntegrableOn u (Ioo a b) volume) (hg : IntegrableOn g (Ioo a b) volume) (hweak : ∀ φ : ℝ → ℝ, ContDiff ℝ (⊤ : ℕ∞) φ → HasCompactSupport φ → tsupport φ ⊆ Ioo a b → ∫ x in Ioo a b, u x * deriv φ x = -∫ x in Ioo a b, g x * φ x) : ∀ᵐ x ∂(volume.restrict (Ioo a b)), u x = 0 → g x = 0 := by obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := w11_ae_eq_ac_representative hab hu hg hweak set F := fun x => C + ∫ t in a..x, g t -- We need global a.e. differentiability. Use g̃ = indicator (Ioo a b) g (globally integrable). -- F̃(x) = C + ∫_a^x g̃ agrees with F on (a,b) and is globally a.e. differentiable. set g' := (Ioo a b).indicator g have hg'_li : LocallyIntegrable g' volume := ((integrable_indicator_iff measurableSet_Ioo).mpr hg).locallyIntegrable -- F̃ has derivative g̃ a.e. globally (by FTC for locally integrable functions) set F' := fun x => C + ∫ t in a..x, g' t have hF'_ae : ∀ᵐ x, HasDerivAt F' (g' x) x := by filter_upwards [LocallyIntegrable.ae_hasDerivAt_integral hg'_li] with x hx have := (hasDerivAt_const x C).add (hx a) simp only [zero_add] at this; exact this -- Apply deriv_eq_zero_ae_on_zeroSet to F' have hF'_deriv_ae : ∀ᵐ x, HasDerivAt F' (deriv F' x) x := hF'_ae.mono fun x hx => by rwa [hx.deriv] have hF'_zero := deriv_eq_zero_ae_on_zeroSet hF'_deriv_ae -- On (a,b): g' = g, F' = F, so combine with hC and hF'_zero. have hint_eq : ∀ x ∈ Ioo a b, (∫ t in a..x, g' t) = ∫ t in a..x, g t := by intro x hx; apply intervalIntegral.integral_congr_ae; apply ae_of_all intro t ht; rw [uIoc_of_le hx.1.le] at ht exact indicator_of_mem (show t ∈ Ioo a b from ⟨ht.1, lt_of_le_of_lt ht.2 hx.2⟩) g filter_upwards [ae_restrict_of_ae (s := Ioo a b) hF'_ae, ae_restrict_of_ae (s := Ioo a b) hF'_zero, hC, ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioo] with x hF'_d hF'_z hu_eq hx_mem intro hu_zero have hg'_eq : g' x = g x := indicator_of_mem hx_mem g have hF'_eq : F' x = C + ∫ t in a..x, g t := by change C + ∫ t in a..x, g' t = _; congr 1; exact hint_eq x hx_mem rw [← hg'_eq, ← hF'_d.deriv] exact hF'_z (by rw [hF'_eq]; show C + ∫ t in a..x, g t = 0; linarith [hu_eq])- Project
- DeGiorgi
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- 4c1b3077d378
- Source
- DeGiorgi/StampacchiaTruncation.lean:461-499
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Ae eq of tendsto e Lp Norm sub
BareFunction.ae_eq_of_tendsto_eLpNorm_sub
Plain-language statement
Lp limit uniqueness: if f_n → g₁ and f_n → g₂ in eLpNorm, then g₁ =ᵐ g₂.
Source project: DeGiorgi
Person-level attribution pending.
E Lp Norm pi le sum component
BareFunction.eLpNorm_pi_le_sum_component
Plain-language statement
Vector eLpNorm ≤ sum of component eLpNorms for Pi-valued functions. Uses eLpNorm_mono_real for the pointwise bound together with eLpNorm_sum_le for ℝ-valued functions, avoiding Pi instance synthesis.
Source project: DeGiorgi
Person-level attribution pending.
Mem Lp of tendsto e Lp Norm
BareFunction.memLp_of_tendsto_eLpNorm
Plain-language statement
If f n → g in eLpNorm and each f n ∈ Lp, then g ∈ Lp, provided g is AEStronglyMeasurable. Avoids the Lp type entirely. The key observation: eLpNorm (f n - g) → 0 means eLpNorm (f N - g) < 1 for some N. Then eLpNorm g ≤ eLpNorm (f N - g) + eLpNorm (f N) < ∞.
Source project: DeGiorgi
Person-level attribution pending.