Prop3d4₀func defprop2
HarderNarasimhan.impl.prop3d4₀func_defprop2
Plain-language statement
Another key property of the recursion: step i+1 is chosen to be “maximal among those with at least its μA-value”, in the sense that no z strictly between step i+1 and step i can have μA (I.left, z) greater-or-equal to μA (I.left, step(i+1)). This is a tie-breaking/optimality condition derived from minimality in the well-founded has_min cho...
Exact Lean statement
lemma prop3d4₀func_defprop2
{ℒ : Type*} [Nontrivial ℒ] [Lattice ℒ] [BoundedOrder ℒ] [inst_3 : WellFoundedGT ℒ]
{S : Type*} [CompleteLattice S]
(μ : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2} → S)
(I : {p : ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2})
(i : ℕ) (hi : I.val.1 ≠ (prop3d4₀func μ I (i + 1)).val) :
∀ z : ℒ, (hz : (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).val < z ∧ z ≤ (prop3d4₀func μ I i).val) →
¬ μA μ ⟨(I.val.1, z),lt_of_le_of_lt (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).prop.1 hz.1⟩ ≥
μA μ ⟨(I.val.1 , (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).val) ,
lt_of_le_of_ne (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).prop.1 hi⟩Formal artifact
Lean source
lemma prop3d4₀func_defprop2{ℒ : Type*} [Nontrivial ℒ] [Lattice ℒ] [BoundedOrder ℒ] [inst_3 : WellFoundedGT ℒ]{S : Type*} [CompleteLattice S](μ : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2} → S)(I : {p : ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2})(i : ℕ) (hi : I.val.1 ≠ (prop3d4₀func μ I (i + 1)).val) :∀ z : ℒ, (hz : (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).val < z ∧ z ≤ (prop3d4₀func μ I i).val) → ¬ μA μ ⟨(I.val.1, z),lt_of_le_of_lt (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).prop.1 hz.1⟩ ≥ μA μ ⟨(I.val.1 , (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).val) , lt_of_le_of_ne (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).prop.1 hi⟩ := by intro z hz simp only [prop3d4₀func, prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi] have hne : (ℒₛ μ I (prop3d4₀func μ I i) <| prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi).Nonempty := by by_contra hcontra simp only [prop3d4₀func, prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi, hcontra] at hi simp only [↓reduceDIte, ne_eq, not_true_eq_false] at hi simp only [hne] by_contra hcontra have h' : z ∈ (ℒₛ μ I (prop3d4₀func μ I i) <| prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi) := by use ⟨le_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (prop3d4₀func μ I (i + 1)).prop.1 hz.1, le_trans hz.2 (prop3d4₀func μ I i).prop.2⟩ have h'' : z < (prop3d4₀func μ I i).val := by apply lt_of_le_of_ne hz.2 by_contra hcontra' simp only [hcontra', ↓reduceDIte, ge_iff_le] at hcontra exact (inst_3.wf.has_min (ℒₛ μ I (prop3d4₀func μ I i) <| prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi) hne ).choose_spec.1.out.choose_spec.choose_spec.not_ge hcontra use ⟨ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (prop3d4₀func μ I (i+1)).prop.1 hz.1,h''⟩, lt_of_le_of_lt' hcontra.ge (inst_3.wf.has_min (ℒₛ μ I (prop3d4₀func μ I i) <| prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi) hne).choose_spec.1.out.choose_spec.choose_spec simp only [prop3d4₀func, prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi, hne] at hz exact (inst_3.wf.has_min (ℒₛ μ I (prop3d4₀func μ I i) <| prop3d4₀func_helper μ I i hi) hne ).choose_spec.2 z h' hz.1- Project
- Harder-Narasimhan
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- 20220e90b72c
- Source
- HarderNarasimhan/Semistability/Impl.lean:187-219
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Associated Primes ker mk Linear Map eq
HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_eq
Project documentation
Associated primes of the kernel of the localization map. This identifies the associated primes of ker (LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M) : Submodule R M with the associated primes of M that do meet the multiplicative set S. Equivalently, these are the associated primes of M after removing those disjoint from S. This lemma is used as the “kernel...
Source project: Harder-Narasimhan
Person-level attribution pending.
Associated Primes ker mk Linear Map subset
HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_subset
Plain-language statement
One-sided inclusion for associated primes of the kernel of the localization map. If p ∈ associatedPrimes R (ker (mkLinearMap S M)), then p is an associated prime of M and p is not disjoint from the multiplicative set S. This is one direction of associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_eq.
Source project: Harder-Narasimhan
Person-level attribution pending.
Associated Primes localized Module subset disjoint
HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_localizedModule_subset_disjoint
Plain-language statement
Associated primes of a localized module are disjoint from the multiplicative set. More precisely, if p ∈ associatedPrimes R (LocalizedModule S M), then p.carrier ∩ S = ∅. This is a standard fact in commutative algebra: an element of S becomes a unit after localization, so no associated prime of the localized module can contain an element of S.
Source project: Harder-Narasimhan
Person-level attribution pending.