All proofs
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0 · mathlib@fabf563a

Prop4d8

HarderNarasimhan.impl.prop4d8

Plain-language statement

Proposition 4.8 (implementation form): μQuotient r d is slope-like. Assumptions: - Additivity of d and r along composable intervals: for x<y<z, we have d(x,z) = d(x,y) + d(y,z) and r(x,z) = r(x,y) + r(y,z). - Positivity condition: if r(x,y) = 0 then d(x,y) > 0. Conclusion: - The quotient construction μQuotient r d satisfies the slope-lik...

Exact Lean statement

lemma prop4d8 {ℒ : Type*} [Nontrivial ℒ] [PartialOrder ℒ] [BoundedOrder ℒ]
{V : Type*} [TotallyOrderedRealVectorSpace V] [Nontrivial V]
(r : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2} → NNReal)
(d : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2} → V)
(h₁ : ∀ (x y z : ℒ), (h : x < y ∧ y < z) → d ⟨(x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2⟩ = d ⟨(x, y), h.1⟩ +
  d ⟨(y, z), h.2⟩ ∧ r ⟨(x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2⟩ = r ⟨(x, y), h.1⟩ + r ⟨(y, z), h.2⟩)
(h₂ : ∀ (x y : ℒ), (h : x < y) → r ⟨(x, y), h⟩ = 0 → d ⟨(x, y), h⟩ > 0)
: SlopeLike (μQuotient r d)

Formal artifact

Lean source

Canonical source
Full Lean sourceLean 4
lemma prop4d8 {ℒ : Type*} [Nontrivial ℒ] [PartialOrder ℒ] [BoundedOrder ℒ]{V : Type*} [TotallyOrderedRealVectorSpace V] [Nontrivial V](r : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2}  NNReal)(d : {p :ℒ × ℒ // p.1 < p.2}  V)(h₁ :  (x y z : ℒ), (h : x < y  y < z)  d (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2 = d (x, y), h.1 +  d (y, z), h.2  r (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2 = r (x, y), h.1 + r (y, z), h.2)(h₂ :  (x y : ℒ), (h : x < y)  r (x, y), h = 0  d (x, y), h > 0): SlopeLike (μQuotient r d) := by  have smul_lt_smul_iff_pos {c : NNReal} (hc : c > 0) (b₁ b₂ : V) :      c • b₁ < c • b₂  b₁ < b₂ := by    have hc' : (0 : ) < (c : ) := NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc    simpa [NNReal.smul_def] using smul_lt_smul_iff_of_pos_left hc'  have smul_lt_smul_pos {c : NNReal} {b₁ b₂ : V} (hb : b₁ < b₂) (hc : c > 0) : c • b₁ < c • b₂ :=    (smul_lt_smul_iff_pos hc b₁ b₂).2 hb  let μ := μQuotient r d  refine (prop4d6 μ).2 fun x y z h  ?_  rcases eq_zero_or_pos (r (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2) with h' | h'  · have : r (x, y), h.1 = 0  r (y, z), h.2 = 0 := add_eq_zero.1 <| (h₁ x y z h).2 ▸ h'    have : ¬ r (y, z), h.2 > 0  ¬ r (x,y), h.1 > 0 := by      constructor      · rw [this.2]        exact not_lt_zero      · rw [this.1]        exact not_lt_zero    have : μ (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2 = μ (x, y), h.1 = μ (y, z), h.2 =:= by      refine ?_,?_,?_⟩⟩      · simp only [μQuotient, h', gt_iff_lt, lt_self_iff_false, ↓reduceDIte, μ]      · simp only [μQuotient, gt_iff_lt, this.2, ↓reduceDIte, μ]      · simp only [μQuotient, gt_iff_lt, this.1, ↓reduceDIte, μ]    aesop  · by_cases h'' : r (x, y), h.1 > 0  r (y, z), h.2 > 0    · rcases μQuotient_helper r d (x, y), h.1 h''.1 with μxy,hxy₁,hxy₂⟩⟩      rcases μQuotient_helper r d (y, z), h.2 h''.2 with μyz,hyz₁,hyz₂⟩⟩      rcases μQuotient_helper r d (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2 h' with μxz,hxz₁,hxz₂⟩⟩      have := add_smul (r (x, y), h.1) (r (y, z), h.2) μxz ▸ (h₁ x y z h).2        hxy₂ ▸ hyz₂ ▸ hxz₂ ▸ (h₁ x y z h).1      simp only [hxy₁, hxz₁, OrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt, hyz₁, gt_iff_lt,        EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, μ]      by_cases hs : μxy < μxz      · exact Or.inl hs,(smul_lt_smul_iff_pos h''.2 _ _).1 <|          (add_lt_add_iff_left <| r (x, y), h.1 • μxy).1 <| lt_sub_iff_add_lt.1 <|          (eq_sub_of_add_eq this) ▸ (smul_lt_smul_iff_pos h''.1 _ _).2 hs      · by_cases hs' : μxy = μxz        · refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| hs',?_          rw [hs'] at this          have h_eq : r (y, z), h.2 • μxz = r (y, z), h.2 • μyz :=            (add_right_inj (r (x, y), h.1 • μxz)).mp this          have hμ_eq : μxz = μyz := by            by_contra! hne            have hlt : μxz < μyz  μyz < μxz := lt_or_gt_of_ne hne            rcases hlt with (hlt | hlt)            · exact (smul_lt_smul_pos hlt h''.2).ne h_eq            · exact (smul_lt_smul_pos hlt h''.2).ne h_eq.symm          exact hμ_eq        · have hs' : μxz < μxy := lt_of_not_ge (Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a  ¬_a)            (propext le_iff_eq_or_lt))) (not_or.mpr hs', hs))          exact Or.inr <| Or.inl <| hs',(smul_lt_smul_iff_pos h''.2 _ _).1 <|            (add_lt_add_iff_left <| r (x, y), h.1 • μxy).1 <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <|            (eq_sub_of_add_eq this) ▸ (smul_lt_smul_iff_pos h''.1 _ _).2 hs'    · by_cases h''' : r (x, y), h.1 = 0  r (y, z), h.2 > 0      · have h2 : μ (x, y), h.1 =:= by simp only [μQuotient, h'''.1, gt_iff_lt,        lt_self_iff_false, ↓reduceDIte, μ]        have h4 := (zero_add <| r (y, z), h.2) ▸ h'''.1 ▸ (h₁ x y z h).2        rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 (h2 ▸ le_top : μ (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2  μ (x, y), h.1)          with h3 | h3        · rcases μQuotient_helper r d (x,z),lt_trans h.1 h.2 (h4 ▸ h'''.2) with w,hw₁,_⟩⟩          simp only [μ] at h3; simp only [μ] at h2          exact False.elim (not_top_lt ((h2 ▸ h3 ▸ hw₁).symm ▸            not_top_of_Nontrivial_TotallyOrderedRealVectorSpace w))        · refine Or.inr <| Or.inl <| h3,?_          simp only [μQuotient, gt_iff_lt, Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a  _a > 0) h4)) h'''.right,            ↓reduceDIte, Function.Embedding.toFun_eq_coe, RelEmbedding.coe_toEmbedding, h'''.2,            OrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt, μ]          exact h4 ▸ ((smul_lt_smul_iff_pos (by exact Right.inv_pos.mpr h') _ _).2 <|            (h₁ x y z h).1 ▸ lt_add_of_pos_left (d (y, z), h.right) <| h₂ x y h.1 h'''.1)      · apply not_and_or.1 at h''        apply not_and_or.1 at h'''        simp only [pos_iff_ne_zero.symm, gt_iff_lt, not_lt, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h'''        have : r (y, z), h.2 = 0 := by aesop        have this' := (add_zero <| r (x, y), h.1) ▸ (this ▸ (h₁ x y z h).2) ▸ h'        have h2 : μ (y, z), h.2 =:= by simp only [μQuotient, this, gt_iff_lt,          lt_self_iff_false, ↓reduceDIte, μ]        have h4 := (add_zero <| r (x, y), h.1) ▸ this ▸ (h₁ x y z h).2        rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 (h2 ▸ le_top : μ (x, z), lt_trans h.1 h.2  μ (y, z), h.2)          with h3 | h3        · rcases μQuotient_helper r d (x,z),lt_trans h.1 h.2 (h4 ▸ this') with w,hw₁,_          simp only [μ] at h3; simp only [μ] at h2          exact False.elim (not_top_lt            ((h2 ▸ h3 ▸ hw₁).symm ▸ not_top_of_Nontrivial_TotallyOrderedRealVectorSpace w))        · refine Or.inl <| ?_,h3          simp only [μQuotient, gt_iff_lt, this', ↓reduceDIte, Function.Embedding.toFun_eq_coe,            RelEmbedding.coe_toEmbedding, Eq.mpr (id (congrArg (fun _a  _a > 0) h4)),            OrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt, μ]          exact h4 ▸ ((smul_lt_smul_iff_pos (by exact Right.inv_pos.mpr h') _ _).2 <|            (h₁ x y z h).1 ▸ lt_add_of_pos_right (d (x, y), h.1) <| h₂ y z h.2 this)
Project
Harder-Narasimhan
License
Apache-2.0
Commit
20220e90b72c
Source
HarderNarasimhan/SlopeLike/Impl.lean:154-248

Reuse this declaration

Bring the exact result into your workflow

The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.

What this badge means

This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.

Continue in this project

Related declarations

Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Associated Primes ker mk Linear Map eq

HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_eq

Project documentation

Associated primes of the kernel of the localization map. This identifies the associated primes of ker (LocalizedModule.mkLinearMap S M) : Submodule R M with the associated primes of M that do meet the multiplicative set S. Equivalently, these are the associated primes of M after removing those disjoint from S. This lemma is used as the “kernel...

algebraic geometryvector bundlescategory theory

Source project: Harder-Narasimhan

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Associated Primes ker mk Linear Map subset

HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_subset

Plain-language statement

One-sided inclusion for associated primes of the kernel of the localization map. If p ∈ associatedPrimes R (ker (mkLinearMap S M)), then p is an associated prime of M and p is not disjoint from the multiplicative set S. This is one direction of associatedPrimes_ker_mkLinearMap_eq.

algebraic geometryvector bundlescategory theory

Source project: Harder-Narasimhan

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record
Project-declaredLean 4.31.0

Associated Primes localized Module subset disjoint

HarderNarasimhan.CommutativeAlgebra.associatedPrimes_localizedModule_subset_disjoint

Plain-language statement

Associated primes of a localized module are disjoint from the multiplicative set. More precisely, if p ∈ associatedPrimes R (LocalizedModule S M), then p.carrier ∩ S = ∅. This is a standard fact in commutative algebra: an element of S becomes a unit after localization, so no associated prime of the localized module can contain an element of S.

algebraic geometryvector bundlescategory theory

Source project: Harder-Narasimhan

Person-level attribution pending.

View proof record