Integral is Dimensionally Correct
integral_isDimensionallyCorrect
Plain-language statement
The statement that for a measure μ of dimension d, and a function f : M → G of dimension (CarriesDimension.d G * d⁻¹) (where CarriesDimension.d G is the dimension associated with terms of type G), then ∫ x, f x ∂μ has the correct dimension, namely CarriesDimension.d G. In other words, the function: ``` fun (μ : DimSet (MeasureTheory.Measu...
Exact Lean statement
lemma integral_isDimensionallyCorrect (d : Dimension LTMCTDimensionBase) :
IsDimensionallyCorrect (fun (μ : DimSet (MeasureTheory.Measure M) d)
(f : DimSet (M → G) (dim G * d⁻¹)) ↦ ∫ x, f.1 x ∂μ.1)Formal artifact
Lean source
lemma integral_isDimensionallyCorrect (d : Dimension LTMCTDimensionBase) : IsDimensionallyCorrect (fun (μ : DimSet (MeasureTheory.Measure M) d) (f : DimSet (M → G) (dim G * d⁻¹)) ↦ ∫ x, f.1 x ∂μ.1) := by intro u1 u2 funext ⟨μ, hμ⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ /- We have to prove that `scaleUnit u1 (fun μ f ↦ ∫ x, f x ∂μ) u2 ⟨μ, hμ⟩ ⟨f, hf⟩ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ` -/ calc _ /- By definition the LHS is equal to `scaleUnit u1 u2 (∫ x, (scaleUnit u2 u1 f) x ∂(scaleUnit u2 u1 μ)) ` The statement says, suppose `f` and `μ` are in units `u2`, we change them to units `u1`, then do the integral, and then we take the result back to `u2`. If the integral is dimensionally correct, this should be the same as just doing the original integral in `u2` units i.e. `∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/ _ = scaleUnit u1 u2 (∫ x, (scaleUnit u2 u1 f) x ∂(scaleUnit u2 u1 μ)) := by simp /- Since we have assumed `μ` has dimension `d`, `(scaleUnit u2 μ u1)` is equal to `(u2.dimScale u1 d) • μ` -/ _ = scaleUnit u1 u2 (u2.dimScale u1 d • ∫ (x : M), scaleUnit u2 u1 f x ∂ μ) := by rw [hμ, integral_smul_nnreal_measure] /- Since we assumed `f` has dimension `CarriesDimension.d G * d⁻¹`, `(scaleUnit u2 f u1)` is equal to `u2.dimScale u1 (CarriesDimension.d G * d⁻¹) • f`. -/ _ = scaleUnit u1 u2 (u2.dimScale u1 d • u2.dimScale u1 (dim G * d⁻¹) • ∫ (x : M), f x ∂ μ) := by rw [hf] congr erw [MeasureTheory.integral_smul] rfl /- What remains is a simple cancellation of the dimensional scales. -/ _ = (u1.dimScale u2 (dim G)) • ((u2.dimScale u1 d) • u2.dimScale u1 (dim G * d⁻¹) • ∫ (x : M), f x ∂ μ) := by rw [← HasDim.scaleUnit_apply] _ = (u1.dimScale u2 (dim G) * (u2.dimScale u1 d) * u2.dimScale u1 (dim G * d⁻¹)) • ∫ (x : M), f x ∂ μ := by simp [smul_smul] ring_nf _ = ((u1.dimScale u2 (dim G) * u2.dimScale u1 (dim G)) * (u2.dimScale u1 d * u1.dimScale u2 d)) • ∫ (x : M), f x ∂ μ := by congr 1 conv_lhs => simp only [map_mul] rw [UnitChoices.dimScale_of_inv_eq_swap] ring _ = ∫ (x : M), f x ∂ μ := by simp- Project
- Physlib
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- dd43e9e65791
- Source
- Physlib/Units/Integral.lean:72-114
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Adiabatic relation log
adiabatic_relation_log
Plain-language statement
Adiabatic relation in logarithmic form: If S(Ua,Va,N) = S(Ub,Vb,N) with N fixed, then c * log (Ua/Ub) + log (Va/Vb) = 0.
Source project: Physlib
Person-level attribution pending.
Adiabatic relation Ua Ub Va Vb
adiabatic_relation_UaUbVaVb
Plain-language statement
Adiabatic relation in product form: If S(Ua,Va,N) = S(Ub,Vb,N) with N fixed, then (Ua/Ub)^c * (Va/Vb) = 1.
Source project: Physlib
Person-level attribution pending.
Deriv Within mean Energy Beta eq neg variance
CanonicalEnsemble.derivWithin_meanEnergy_Beta_eq_neg_variance
Plain-language statement
(∂U/∂β) = -Var(E) for finite systems.
Source project: Physlib
Person-level attribution pending.