Erdős Problem 184
Any graph on vertices can be decomposed into many edge-disjoint cycles and edges.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Any graph on vertices can be decomposed into many edge-disjoint cycles and edges.
In [Er71] Erdős suggests that only many cycles and edges are required if we do not require them to be edge-disjoint.
What is the smallest such that can be red/blue coloured with no pair of red points unit distance apart, and no -term arithmetic progression of blue points with distance 1?
Seems to be open, as of January 2025.
Let be a finite set and let be an infinite -walk, so that for all . Must contain three collinear points?
What is the largest such that in any permutation of there must exist a monotone -term arithmetic progression ?
Must every permutation of , contain a monotone 4-term arithmetic progression?
Can be partitioned into two sets, each of which can be permuted to avoid monotone 3-term arithmetic progressions?
Is it true that for some constant and for all ?
Does the longest arithmetic progression of primes in have length ?
Is there an integer with such that none of are prime, for any ?
Can every triangle-free graph on vertices be made bipartite by deleting at most edges?
Let count the number of solutions to for prime and . Show that .
Is it true that ?
Originally asked to Erdős by Bose.
This is discussed in problem C11 of Guy's collection [Gu04].
More generally, Bose and Chowla [BoCh62] conjectured that the maximum size of with all -fold sums distinct (aside from the trivial coincidences) then
Let . What is the largest such that there are with a non-empty arithmetic progression for all ?
Szabo asks whether the maximal is given by
Is there a covering system all of whose moduli are of the form for some primes ?
Let be an infinite set and consider the following greedy algorithm for a rational : choose the minimal such that and repeat with replaced by . If this terminates after finitely many steps then this produces a representation of as the sum of distinct unit fractions with denominators from .
Does this process always terminate if has odd denominator and is the set of odd numbers?
More generally, for which pairs and does this process terminate?