Ben Green's Open Problem 37
Given a natural number N, what is the smallest size of a subset of ℕ that contains, for each d = 1, …, N,
an arithmetic progression of length k with common difference d.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Given a natural number N, what is the smallest size of a subset of ℕ that contains, for each d = 1, …, N,
an arithmetic progression of length k with common difference d.
Asymptotic version: determine the asymptotic behavior of m(N, k) as N grows.
The solver should determine what function f : ℕ → ℝ eventually equals (fun N ↦ (m N k : ℝ)).
Determine the asymptotic equivalence class (theta) of m(N, k).
Determine an upper bound (big O) for m(N, k).
Determine a strict upper bound (little o) for m(N, k).
Can we improve the lower bound?
Can we improve the best upper bound?
If is random, , can we almost surely cover with translates of ? [Gr24]
"I do not know how to answer this even with 100 replaced by 1.01." [Gr24]"
Similar questions are interesting with replaced by for any . [Gr24]
NOTE: using translates as stated makes the conjecture trivially false by the pigeonhole principle. Indeed for a set of size , we cover at most elements, which is strictly less than for . We interpret the question as asking whether translates suffice. This generalizes the main conjecture where .
Does ? [Gr24]
The possibility that f(r) = 1 for all r has not been ruled out [Gr24]
It is not known whether f(2) = 1 [Gr24]
Does ? [Gr24]
Does ? [Gr24]
Which finite groups have the smallest biggest product-free sets?
We formalise this as: determine the supremum of exponents such that every nontrivial finite group of order contains a product-free set of size for some absolute constant . (The trivial group is excluded since its only product-free subset is empty.) Kedlaya [Ke97] showed that is admissible, and Green suggests this exponent may well be sharp; the candidate extremal family is the Ree groups , .
A good model problem would be to determine the largest product-free subsets of .
Let be a set of density . Does contain a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
More precisely: does there exist an absolute constant such that for all and all nonempty with density , the sumset contains a coset of some subspace of dimension at least ?
The sumset is defined as , using the pointwise
scalar multiplication notation 10 • A where • denotes the iterated addition of a set.
Note: We model as Fin n → ZMod 2, which is an -dimensional vector space
over .
Suppose that is a set of density . What is the largest size of coset guaranteed to be contained in ?
We phrase this by asking for the exact function giving the maximum dimension of a guaranteed coset.
Suppose that has density . Does contain a subspace of co-dimension ? [Sa11, Question 5.1]