Erdős Problem 723
If there is a finite projective plane of order then must be a prime power?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.1194 of 1194 statement records
17 source collections · 43 mathematical fields
If there is a finite projective plane of order then must be a prime power?
Is irrational? Here is the Euler totient function.
It is open whether there exists a projective plane of order 12.
Let be an arbitrary sequence of integers, each with an associated residue class . Let be the set of integers such that for every either or . Must the logarithmic density of exist?
Let possibly very slowly. Is there a graph of infinite chromatic number such that every finite subgraph on vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most edges?
Is irrational? Here is the -th prime ().
Is there a graph of infinite chromatic number such that every finite subgraph on vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most edges?
Erdős Problem 252: irrationality of the sum for a given .
Let be an infinite cardinal and be a graph with chromatic number . Let . Must contain a subgraph of chromatic number which does not contain any odd cycle of length ?
For a fixed k ≥ 5, is ∑ σ k n / n! irrational?.
Let be such that has positive lower density. Can one always decompose such that and both have positive lower density?
Let be such that and for every , where is the distance of from the nearest integer. Then every sufficiently large integer is the sum of distinct elements of .
Murty-Simon Conjecture*
Let be a graph on vertices with diameter such that deleting any edge increases the diameter. Is it true that has at most edges? Equality is conjectured to hold for the complete balanced bipartite graph .
The conjecture is resolved up to a finite check: Fan [Fa87] verified it for and , and Füredi [Fü92] proved it for all sufficiently large .
Let be an infinite set. Is
irrational?
Is there a graph of chromatic number ℵ_ 1 with ℵ_ 1 vertices such that for all
ε > 0, if n is sufficiently large and H is a subgraph on n vertices,
then H contains an independent set of size > n ^ (1 - ε)?
Let be an increasing sequence such that . Is the sum irrational?
What is the supremum of the set of admissible numbers?
Is an irrationality sequence in the above sense?
Is every proportionately dissociated (infinite) set the union of a finite number of dissociated sets?
Is an example of an irrationality sequence?