Banach-Mazur Rotation Problem
The Banach--Mazur rotation problem asks whether every separable Banach space whose group of linear isometric equivalences acts transitively on the unit sphere is linearly isometric to a Hilbert space.
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.1194 of 1194 statement records
17 source collections · 43 mathematical fields
The Banach--Mazur rotation problem asks whether every separable Banach space whose group of linear isometric equivalences acts transitively on the unit sphere is linearly isometric to a Hilbert space.
Show that every bounded linear operator T : H → H on a separable Hilbert space H of dimension
at least 2 has a non-trivial closed T-invariant subspace: a closed linear subspace W of H,
which is different from H and from {0}, such that T ( W ) ⊂ W. One needs the assumption that
the dimension of H is at least 2 because otherwise any subspace would be either H or {0}.
Gerver's sofa is the unique sofa that attains the sofa constant.
.
Let be a set of points with no three on a line. Does determine at least distinct distances?
Is the diameter of at least for some constant ?
The four dimensional case of the smooth version of the conjecture is still open. See [Wang2017].
Does every finite partially ordered set that is not totally ordered contain two elements and such that the probability that appears before in a random linear extension is between and ?
The set of all total order extensions is represented as order preserving bijections of .
Suppose that are two finitely-supported independent random variables taking integer values, and such that is uniformly distributed on its range. Are and themselves uniformly distributed on their ranges?
P ≠ NP*:
The conjecture that the complexity classes P and NP are not equal.
The negation of Finite.Equation677_implies_Equation255.
Probably this is true. It would be a stronger form of
Equation677_not_implies_Equation255.
Discussion thread here: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/458659-Equational/topic/FINITE.3A.20677.20-.3E.20255
If is a crystal, then there are no other pairs of positive integers , different from the couple , such that and , i.e., the components of the crystals are unique.
Is there a polynomial of degree at least and a set such that for any there is exactly one and such that ?
There exists a proper ideal I in a (commutative) total ring R of fractions that is an
invertible module. If I ⊊ R is such an example, I must have infinite order in the Picard group,
and R must not be Noetherian (otherwise it must be semi-local and therefore have trivial Picard
group).
The Jacobian Conjecture: any regular function
(i.e. vector valued polynomial function from) kⁿ → kᵐ
whose Jacobian is a non-zero constant has an inverse that
is given by a regular function, where k is a field of characteristic 0
Benchmark open subproblem: existence of a SIC-POVM in dimension .
The idempotent conjecture*
If G is torsion-free, then K[G] has no non-trivial idempotents.
Let be a group, and let be a finite system of left cosets of subgroups of .
Herzog and Schönheim conjectured that if forms a partition of with , then the indices cannot be distinct.
Equivalent p-adic formulation: the p-adic integers ℤ_[p] cannot act continuously and
faithfully on any connected finite-dimensional topological manifold. By the Gleason–Yamabe
theorem, this is equivalent to hilbert_smith_conjecture.
Lower bound for for , improving the known value at or .