Erdős Problem 1072: Ii
Is it true that for in a density 1 subset of the primes?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Is it true that for in a density 1 subset of the primes?
Erdős, Hardy, and Subbarao [HaSu02], believed that the number of for which is .
[HaSu02] Hardy, G. E. and Subbarao, M. V., A modified problem of Pillai and some related questions. Amer. Math. Monthly (2002), 554--559.
Does the longest arithmetic progression of primes in have length ?
Is it true that ?
Let be the set of all such that there exists a prime such that . Does
exist?
Let be the set of all such that there exists a prime such that . What is
Let count the number of solutions to for prime and . Show that .
Similarly, if is the set of all primes such that there exists an with such that , then does
exist?
Similarly, if is the set of all primes such that there exists an with such that , then what is
Regarding the first question, Hardy and Subbarao computed all EHS numbers up to , and write "...if this trend conditions we expect [the limit] to be around 0.5, if it exists."
For all the least prime factor of is , with only finitely many exceptions.
Ecklund, Erdős, and Selfridge [EES74] conjectured .
Is there a covering system all of whose moduli are of the form for some primes ?
Erdős, Lacampagne, and Selfridge [ELS93] write 'it is clear to every right-thinking person' that for some constant .
Sorenson, Sorenson, and Webster [SSWE20] give heuristic evidence that .
Is every odd the sum of a squarefree number and a power of 2?
Erdős often asked this under the weaker assumption that is not divisible by 4.
Is every odd the sum of a squarefree number and two powers of 2?
Let denote the smallest such that there exists with
Is it true that ?