Erdős Problem 243
Let be a sequence of integers such that and .
Then, for all sufficiently large , .
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.Let be a sequence of integers such that and .
Then, for all sufficiently large , .
The Flint Hills series summing from to converges. (Note that we 0-index the series below.)
The Cookson Hills series summing from to converges.
Conjecture: Voronovskaja-type formula for Bézier-Bernstein operators with shape parameter , .
The source asks for sufficiently smooth functions. This concrete version uses
ContDiffOn ℝ 2 f I as a readable baseline regularity assumption; since the
domain is the compact interval , this also explains why no separate
boundedness assumption is included here. The variants below record the unknown
smoothness threshold more explicitly.
Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem which treats "sufficiently smooth" as an eventual condition in the smoothness order : for all sufficiently large finite , every function on should have the asserted asymptotic formula.
Existence-only version of the eventual-smoothness variant. This separates the first part of the source problem, proving that the scaled sequence has some limit, from the stronger task of finding an explicit expression for that limit.
Variant of the Bézier-Bernstein Voronovskaja problem with the required smoothness order itself
left as an answer. Replacing (answer(sorry) : ℕ × ((ℝ → ℝ) → ℝ → ℝ)) by a concrete value lets one
state the conjecture for a chosen regularity threshold.
Do infinitely many pairs occur in Ulam's sequence?
Does Ulam's sequence eventually have periodic differences? That is, is eventually periodic?
Part (iii), is the density of the sequence 0?