Smoothed Chebyshev Pull2
SmoothedChebyshevPull2
Plain-language statement
For the smoothed Chebyshev integrand the central part of the normalized vertical integral on can be shifted to . With the project's contour-piece notation, the complete decomposition is where and are the unchanged tails, is the new central vertical side, and are the horizontal connectors.
Exact Lean statement
@[blueprint
(title := "SmoothedChebyshevPull2")
(statement := /--
We have that
$$
I_{37} =
I_3 - I_4 + I_5 + I_6 + I_7
.
$$
-/)
(proof := /-- Mimic the proof of Lemma \ref{SmoothedChebyshevPull1}. -/)
(latexEnv := "lemma")]
theorem SmoothedChebyshevPull2 {SmoothingF : ℝ → ℝ} {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (ε_lt_one : ε < 1)
(X : ℝ) (_ : 3 < X)
{T : ℝ} (T_pos : 3 < T) {σ₁ σ₂ : ℝ}
(σ₂_pos : 0 < σ₂) (σ₁_lt_one : σ₁ < 1)
(σ₂_lt_σ₁ : σ₂ < σ₁)
(holoOn : HolomorphicOn (ζ' / ζ) ((Icc σ₁ 2) ×ℂ (Icc (-T) T) \ {1}))
(holoOn2 : HolomorphicOn (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X)
(Icc σ₂ 2 ×ℂ Icc (-3) 3 \ {1}))
(suppSmoothingF : Function.support SmoothingF ⊆ Icc (1 / 2) 2)
(SmoothingFnonneg : ∀ x > 0, 0 ≤ SmoothingF x)
(mass_one : ∫ x in Ioi 0, SmoothingF x / x = 1)
(diff_SmoothingF : ContDiff ℝ 1 SmoothingF) :
I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ =
I₃ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ -
I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ +
I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₂ +
I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ +
I₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁Formal artifact
Lean source
@[blueprint (title := "SmoothedChebyshevPull2") (statement := /-- We have that $$ I_{37} = I_3 - I_4 + I_5 + I_6 + I_7 . $$ -/) (proof := /-- Mimic the proof of Lemma \ref{SmoothedChebyshevPull1}. -/) (latexEnv := "lemma")]theorem SmoothedChebyshevPull2 {SmoothingF : ℝ → ℝ} {ε : ℝ} (ε_pos : 0 < ε) (ε_lt_one : ε < 1) (X : ℝ) (_ : 3 < X) {T : ℝ} (T_pos : 3 < T) {σ₁ σ₂ : ℝ} (σ₂_pos : 0 < σ₂) (σ₁_lt_one : σ₁ < 1) (σ₂_lt_σ₁ : σ₂ < σ₁) (holoOn : HolomorphicOn (ζ' / ζ) ((Icc σ₁ 2) ×ℂ (Icc (-T) T) \ {1})) (holoOn2 : HolomorphicOn (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) (Icc σ₂ 2 ×ℂ Icc (-3) 3 \ {1})) (suppSmoothingF : Function.support SmoothingF ⊆ Icc (1 / 2) 2) (SmoothingFnonneg : ∀ x > 0, 0 ≤ SmoothingF x) (mass_one : ∫ x in Ioi 0, SmoothingF x / x = 1) (diff_SmoothingF : ContDiff ℝ 1 SmoothingF) : I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ = I₃ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₂ + I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ := by let z : ℂ := σ₂ - 3 * I let w : ℂ := σ₁ + 3 * I have σ₁_pos : 0 < σ₁ := by linarith -- Step (1) -- Show that the Rectangle is in a given subset of holomorphicity have sub : z.Rectangle w ⊆ Icc σ₂ 2 ×ℂ Icc (-3) 3 \ {1} := by -- for every point x in the Rectangle intro x hx constructor · -- x is in the locus of holomorphicity simp only [Rectangle, uIcc] at hx rw [Complex.mem_reProdIm] at hx ⊢ obtain ⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ := hx -- the real part of x is in the correct interval have hzw_re : z.re < w.re := by simpa [z, w] using σ₂_lt_σ₁ have x_re_bounds : z.re ≤ x.re ∧ x.re ≤ w.re := by exact interval_membership x.re z.re w.re hx_re hzw_re have x_re_in_Icc : x.re ∈ Icc σ₂ 2 := by have ⟨h_left, h_right⟩ := x_re_bounds have h_left' : σ₂ ≤ x.re := by simpa [z] using h_left have h_right' : x.re ≤ 2 := by apply le_trans h_right have : w.re ≤ 2 := by simp [w] linarith exact this exact ⟨h_left', h_right'⟩ -- the imaginary part of x is in the correct interval have hzw_im : z.im < w.im := by norm_num [z, w] have x_im_bounds : z.im ≤ x.im ∧ x.im ≤ w.im := by exact interval_membership x.im z.im w.im hx_im hzw_im have x_im_in_Icc : x.im ∈ Icc (-3) 3 := by have ⟨h_left, h_right⟩ := x_im_bounds have h_left' : -3 ≤ x.im := by simpa [z] using h_left have h_right' : x.im ≤ 3 := by simpa [w] using h_right exact ⟨h_left', h_right'⟩ exact ⟨x_re_in_Icc, x_im_in_Icc⟩ -- x is not in {1} by contradiction · simp only [mem_singleton_iff] -- x has real part less than 1 have x_re_upper: x.re ≤ σ₁ := by simp only [Rectangle, uIcc] at hx rw [Complex.mem_reProdIm] at hx obtain ⟨hx_re, _⟩ := hx -- the real part of x is in the interval have hzw_re : z.re < w.re := by simpa [z, w] using σ₂_lt_σ₁ have x_re_bounds : z.re ≤ x.re ∧ x.re ≤ w.re := by exact interval_membership x.re z.re w.re hx_re hzw_re have x_re_upper' : x.re ≤ w.re := x_re_bounds.2 have hw_re : w.re = σ₁ := by simp [w] linarith -- by contracdiction have h_x_ne_one : x ≠ 1 := by intro h_eq have h_re : x.re = 1 := by rw [h_eq, Complex.one_re] have h1 : 1 ≤ σ₁ := by rw [← h_re] exact x_re_upper linarith exact h_x_ne_one have zero_over_box := HolomorphicOn.vanishesOnRectangle holoOn2 sub have splitting : I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ = I₃ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ + I₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ := by unfold I₃₇ I₃ I₅ I₇ apply verticalIntegral_split_three_finite' · apply ContinuousOn.integrableOn_Icc unfold SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand apply ContinuousOn.mul · apply ContinuousOn.mul · apply SmoothedChebyshevPull2_aux1 σ₁_lt_one holoOn · apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt intro t t_mem have := Smooth1MellinDifferentiable diff_SmoothingF suppSmoothingF ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt_one⟩ SmoothingFnonneg mass_one (s := ↑σ₁ + ↑t * I) (by simpa) simpa using realDiff_of_complexDiff _ this · apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt intro t t_mem apply ContinuousAt.comp · refine continuousAt_const_cpow' ?_ intro h have : σ₁ = 0 := by have h_real : (↑σ₁ + ↑t * I).re = (0 : ℂ).re := by rw [h] simp only [add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, mul_zero, ofReal_im, I_im, mul_one, sub_self, add_zero, zero_re] at h_real exact h_real linarith · -- continuity -- failed apply ContinuousAt.add · exact continuousAt_const · apply ContinuousAt.mul · apply continuous_ofReal.continuousAt · exact continuousAt_const · refine ⟨by linarith, by linarith, by linarith⟩ calc I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * (0 : ℂ) := by simp _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * (RectangleIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z w) := by rw [← zero_over_box] _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * (HIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re w.re z.im - HIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re w.re w.im + VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) w.re z.im w.im - VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re z.im w.im) := by simp [RectangleIntegral] _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - ((1 / (2 * π * I)) * HIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re w.re z.im - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * HIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re w.re w.im + (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) w.re z.im w.im - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re z.im w.im) := by ring _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * HIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re w.re w.im + (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) w.re z.im w.im - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re z.im w.im) := by simp only [one_div, mul_inv_rev, inv_I, neg_mul, HIntegral, sub_im, ofReal_im, mul_im, re_ofNat, I_im, mul_one, im_ofNat, I_re, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_sub, ofReal_neg, ofReal_ofNat, sub_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, sub_self, sub_zero, add_re, add_im, zero_add, sub_neg_eq_add, I₄, sub_right_inj, add_left_inj, neg_inj, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, mul_eq_zero, I_ne_zero, inv_eq_zero, ofReal_eq_zero, OfNat.ofNat_ne_zero, or_false, false_or, z, w] left rfl _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ - I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) w.re z.im w.im - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re z.im w.im) := by simp only [one_div, mul_inv_rev, inv_I, neg_mul, HIntegral, add_im, ofReal_im, mul_im, re_ofNat, I_im, mul_one, im_ofNat, I_re, mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, ofReal_ofNat, sub_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, sub_self, sub_zero, add_re, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_im, zero_sub, I₆, w, z] _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ - I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ - (1 / (2 * π * I)) * VIntegral (SmoothedChebyshevIntegrand SmoothingF ε X) z.re z.im w.im) := by simp only [one_div, mul_inv_rev, inv_I, neg_mul, VIntegral, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, re_ofNat, I_re, mul_zero, im_ofNat, I_im, mul_one, sub_self, add_zero, sub_im, ofReal_im, mul_im, zero_sub, add_im, zero_add, smul_eq_mul, sub_re, sub_zero, sub_neg_eq_add, I₅, w, z] _ = I₃₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ - I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ - I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₂) := by simp only [I₅, one_div, mul_inv_rev, inv_I, neg_mul, VIntegral, sub_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, re_ofNat, I_re, mul_zero, im_ofNat, I_im, mul_one, sub_self, sub_zero, sub_im, ofReal_im, mul_im, add_zero, zero_sub, add_im, zero_add, smul_eq_mul, sub_neg_eq_add, z, w] --- starting from now, we split the integral `I₃₇` into `I₃ σ₂ + I₅ σ₁ + I₇ σ₁` using `verticalIntegral_split_three_finite` _ = I₃ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ + I₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - (I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ - I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ - I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₂) := by rw [splitting] _ = I₃ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ - I₄ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₅ SmoothingF ε X σ₂ + I₆ SmoothingF ε X σ₁ σ₂ + I₇ SmoothingF ε T X σ₁ := by ring- Project
- Prime Number Theorem and More
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Commit
- a93551347dce
- Source
- PrimeNumberTheoremAnd/MediumPNT.lean:1370-1563
Reuse this declaration
Bring the exact result into your workflow
The import identifies the source module. Your project still needs the pinned package dependency shown on this page.
What this badge means
This completion status comes from the project or community source. It has not yet been represented here as an independent rebuild and axiom audit.
Continue in this project
Related declarations
Admissible bound mono
admissible_bound.mono
Plain-language statement
For positive parameters , the classical error-bound function is nonincreasing once .
Source project: Prime Number Theorem and More
Person-level attribution pending.
Analytic On div Removable zero
AnalyticOn_divRemovable_zero
Plain-language statement
Let be analytic on an open set containing , and suppose . Define for and . Then the apparent singularity at is removable and is analytic throughout .
Source project: Prime Number Theorem and More
Person-level attribution pending.
Analytic On div Removable zero closed Ball
AnalyticOn_divRemovable_zero_closedBall
Plain-language statement
Suppose and is analytic on the closed disc with . Define for and . Then is analytic on the entire closed disc, including at the removed singularity.
Source project: Prime Number Theorem and More
Person-level attribution pending.