Erdős Problem 272
Let . What is the largest such that there are with a non-empty arithmetic progression for all ?
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.1194 of 1194 statement records
17 source collections · 43 mathematical fields
Let . What is the largest such that there are with a non-empty arithmetic progression for all ?
For all the least prime factor of is , with only finitely many exceptions.
Szabo asks whether the maximal is given by
Ecklund, Erdős, and Selfridge [EES74] conjectured .
Is there a covering system all of whose moduli are of the form for some primes ?
Erdős, Lacampagne, and Selfridge [ELS93] write 'it is clear to every right-thinking person' that for some constant .
Let be an infinite set and consider the following greedy algorithm for a rational : choose the minimal such that and repeat with replaced by . If this terminates after finitely many steps then this produces a representation of as the sum of distinct unit fractions with denominators from .
Does this process always terminate if has odd denominator and is the set of odd numbers?
Sorenson, Sorenson, and Webster [SSWE20] give heuristic evidence that .
More generally, for which pairs and does this process terminate?
Is every odd the sum of a squarefree number and a power of 2?
Graham has shown that is the sum of distinct unit fractions with denominators if and only if Does the greedy algorithm always terminate in such cases?
Erdős often asked this under the weaker assumption that is not divisible by 4.
Graham has also shown that is the sum of distinct unit fractions with square denominators if and only if . Does the greedy algorithm for this always terminate? Erdős and Graham believe not - indeed, perhaps it fails to terminate almost always.
Is every odd the sum of a squarefree number and two powers of 2?
Let denote the smallest such that there exists with
Is it true that ?
There are no examples known of the weakened coprime version if we insist that .
Does there exist a constant c > 0 such that, for any K > 1, whenever A is a sufficiently large
finite multiset of integers with there exists some such that
?
Let be the partition number of and be the number of distinct prime factors of , then tends to infinity when tends to infinity.