Erdős Problem 319
What is the size of the largest such that there is a function such that
and
for all non-empty .
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.1194 of 1194 statement records
17 source collections · 43 mathematical fields
What is the size of the largest such that there is a function such that
and
for all non-empty .
Let be the partition number of and be the number of distinct prime factors of , for sufficiently large .
Let be the size of the largest such that there is a function such that
and
for all non-empty . What is ?
Let . Is every large integer the sum of at most many -powerful numbers?
Let be the size of the largest such that there is a function such that
and
for all non-empty . Find the simplest such that $c(N) = O(g(N)).
For each , does the set of all finite sums of distinct factorials contain only finitely many -th powers?
Let be the size of the largest such that there is a function such that
and
for all non-empty . Find the simplest such that $c(N) = o(g(N)).
Does the set of all finite sums of distinct factorials contain only finitely many powerful numbers?
Let be an additive basis of order 2.
Must there exist which is also a basis such that does not exist?
Erdős Problem 1113.* Do there exist Sierpiński numbers that possess no finite covering set of primes?
Erdős and Graham [ErGr80] conjectured that the answer is yes. A negative answer would imply that there are infinitely many Fermat primes.
Erdős Problem 329.*
Let A ⊆ ℕ be a Sidon set. How large can
lim sup_{N → ∞} |A ∩ {1,…,N}| / N^{1/2}
be?
Filaseta–Finch–Kozek conjecture (2008).* Every Sierpiński number is either a perfect power or possesses a finite covering set of primes.
The converse: if the maximum density is 1, then any finite Sidon set can be embedded in a perfect difference set modulo .
Since the consequent is false (due to the counterexamples in [Ha47] and [AlMi25]), this implication is logically equivalent to the statement that the maximum upper density of Sidon sets is NOT 1. Because the maximum upper density problem is still open, the truth value of this implication is also an open research problem.
The Collatz conjecture states that for any positive integer , there exists a natural number such that the -th term of the sequence is 1.
Does there exist a minimal basis with positive density such that, for any , the (upper) density of integers which cannot be represented without using is positive?
Let , where denotes the th prime. Is it true that as ?
Let be the greedy Sidon sequence: we begin with and iteratively include the next smallest integer that preserves the Sidon property (i.e. there are no non-trivial solutions to ). What is the order of growth of ? Is it true that for all and large ?
Let be the sequence of integers with at most prime factors. Is it true that
Let be the greedy Sidon sequence: we begin with and iteratively include the next smallest integer that preserves the Sidon property (i.e. there are no non-trivial solutions to ). What is the order of growth of ? Is it true that for all and large ?
Are there infinitely many such that is prime for all with ?
The only known such are (OEIS A039669).