Erdős Problem 36: Lower
Find a better lower bound!
Questions, not proof records
Each statement record keeps the mathematical question, a dated status source, accessible references, and any pinned Lean formulation separate from proof verification.
sorry marks an admitted statement, not a proof. Source indexing does not mean the formulation has been independently built or certified by Therefore.1194 of 1194 statement records
17 source collections · 43 mathematical fields
Find a better lower bound!
In [Er92b] Erdős makes the stronger conjecture (for , , and ) that, for any , all large integers can be written as the sum of distinct integers of the form where .
Find a better upper bound!
Let and be integers of gcd equal to such that Can all sufficiently large integers be written as a sum of the shape where and is divisible by and has only the digits when written in base ?
Conjectured by Burr, Erdős, Graham, and Li [BEGL96]
Find the value of the limit of MinOverlapQuotient!
Literature question: Does have positive upper density?
A variant asking for explicit bounds on how large N needs to be in terms of M.
This version provides a constructive function f such that for all M ≥ 1 and N ≥ f(M), every maximal Sidon set A ⊆ {1,…,N} has another Sidon set B ⊆ {1,…,N} of size M with disjoint difference sets (apart from 0).
Case 1: Does have zero upper and lower density?
Erdős Problem 44:* Let N ≥ 1 and A ⊆ {1,…,N} be a Sidon set. Is it true that, for any ε > 0,
there exist M = M(ε) and B ⊆ {N+1,…,M} such that A ∪ B ⊆ {1,…,M} is a Sidon set
of size at least (1−ε)M^{1/2}?
This problem asks whether any Sidon set can be extended to achieve a density arbitrarily close to the optimal density for Sidon sets.
Case 2: Does have zero lower density, but positive upper density?
The case where we start with an empty set (constructing large Sidon sets).
Let be maximal such that if has then has at least distinct prime factors. Is it true that ?
Let be a finite set and Is it true that, for every ,
Erdős says that has never been proved.
For every let be a bounded set with outer measure . Must there exist an infinite independent set, that is, some infinite such that for all ?
If the sets are closed and have measure , then must there exist an independent set of size ?
Known results: Erdős–Hajnal [ErHa60] proved the existence of arbitrarily large finite independent sets. Hechler [He72] showed the answer is no assuming the continuum hypothesis.
Let . Can the product of any consecutive integers ever be powerful? That is, must there always exist a prime such that ?
Let , and let denote the size of the largest subset of such that no subset of size has the same pairwise greatest common divisor between all elements. Erdős [Er64] proved that for some constant , and conjectured this should also be an upper bound; here we state the conjectural upper bound for all .
See also [536].
Erdős [Er82c] conjectures that, if is fixed, then for all sufficiently large and all positive integers , there must be at least distinct primes such that and yet does not divide the right hand side.
[Er82c] Erdős, Paul, "Miscellaneous problems in number theory". Congr. Numer. (1982), 25-45.,
The first open case of Erdős Problem 535 is : there should exist such that for all sufficiently large .
In [Er80] Erdős asks whether