Research proof index

The q-expansion of ℘' (Silverman, Advanced topics, Theorem I.6.2): under the hypotheses of weierstrassP_q_expansion, ℘'(z; Λ_τ) = (2πi)³ (Xₐ(e z, e τ) + 2Yₐ(e z, e τ)). Proof: as for weierstrassP_q_expansion, but simpler: group the absolutely convergent sum ℘'(z) = -2∑_ω (z - ω)⁻³ into rows ω = nτ + m (no regularising terms are needed here...

The descent lemma: a formal power series F ∈ ℚ(u)⟦q⟧ vanishes provided that, for infinitely many u₀ : ℂ, the evaluated series ∑ₙ Fₙ(u₀)q₀ⁿ converges with sum 0 for all sufficiently small nonzero q₀. Proof sketch: fix u₀. The function q₀ ↦ ∑ₙ Fₙ(u₀)q₀ⁿ is analytic on ‖q₀‖ < r (a power series converging pointwise on a disc is analytic there)...

The q-expansion of g₂ (Silverman, Advanced topics, Theorem I.7.1): g₂(Λ_τ) = (2πi)⁴/12 ⬝ (1 + 240s₃(q)). This is g₂ = 60G₄ and the case k = 4 of G_q_expansion, with row-sum identity sum_int_inv_fourth and 2ζ(4) = π⁴/45 (hasSum_int_inv_fourth).

The q-expansion of g₃ (Silverman, Advanced topics, Theorem I.7.1): g₃(Λ_τ) = -(2πi)⁶/216 ⬝ (1 - 504s₅(q)). This is g₃ = 140G₆ and the case k = 6 of G_q_expansion, with row-sum identity sum_int_inv_sixth and 2ζ(6) = 2π⁶/945 (hasSum_int_inv_sixth).

Rearrangement for X (extracted from Silverman's proof of Advanced topics, Theorem V.3.1(c)): for 0 < ‖q‖ < ‖u‖ < 1 with u transcendental (so that evaluation of coefficients at u is a ring homomorphism), the coefficients of the formal series TateCurve.X evaluated at u sum to Xₐ(u, q). Proof: expand each term of Xₐ: for n ≥ 1, `qⁿu/(1 -...

Rearrangement for Y: for 0 < ‖q‖ < ‖u‖ < 1 with u transcendental, the coefficients of the formal series TateCurve.Y evaluated at u sum to Yₐ(u, q). Proof: as for hasSum_X_eval, using v²/(1-v)³ = ∑_{m ≥ 1} (m choose 2) vᵐ for the rows n ≥ 1, the rational-function identity v²/(1-v)³ = -v⁻¹/(1-v⁻¹)³ together with `v/(1-v)³ = ∑_{m ≥ 1} ((m...